> Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and joint
> limits?
A robot arm will have joints and axis that completely different.
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
On Monday 12 October 2020 16:02:50 andy pugh wrote:
> I feel that this is the sort of question that I would expect to be
> answering, not asking, but...
>
> Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and
> joint limits? The INI config docs don't really say, and in fact use
>
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:02, andy pugh wrote:
> This sort-of works, but I keep getting soft limit errors when the
> machine is nowhere near the physical joint limits.
Part of this might be because I am using a non-identity kins declaring
as KINEMATICS_IDENTITY, but this was meant to be a minor
I feel that this is the sort of question that I would expect to be
answering, not asking, but...
Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and
joint limits? The INI config docs don't really say, and in fact use
"axis" in the "joints" section to add to the confusion.
I am
Yes!
Another reason for this move would be to increase basic consistency within
the project.
I think it would be reasonable for a user of linuxcnc to expect that all
customizations that come "in the box" be buildable with halcompiler. Maybe
that isn't exactly possible right now but moving things
