Mirko,
this is all getting very muddy now that there is an APEC MRA on Telecom
requirements
and an APEC MRA on Product Safety in the offing. Combine that with Korea
in the throes
of changing over to a program that is more like the FCC program (before the
FCC launches
a Notice of Inquiry on
You're singing to the choir now! I was ecstatic when fiber came up. Pictured
me sitting around have a fine time. Then reality hit. As noted below by
Michael a share of the problem does belong to the transceivers and cables.
Good signal integrity work up to the transceiver is a must. But the
To All,
Thanks to all who responded for your views and experiences regarding EMI
phenomena related to fiber optics.
You confirmed my intuition. I do not have first hand experience with these
beasts, so this gives me ammunition in dealing with problems early as we get
into this type circuitry.
I think this is a lot like the fable about belling the cat (where the
mice decide it would be nice if the cat wore a bell, so it could not
sneak up on them). All the mice agreed it was a great plan, until one
old spoil-sport asked who was going to bell the cat. What I'm saying is
that while
What an interesting discussion!
As many others, I suspect, I believed that the CE mark was extended to
cover the LVD (and possibly other safety requirements) in order to permit
use of a harmonized standard rather than various national ones.
Well, I've been wrong before, so it would be no
Arun:
I heartily agree with everything you said. Well done!
It will not be easy to sell this idea to the emc world.
When the standards are vague, acane and constantly-changing, and when it is
unnecessarily expensive to set up and perform a test, this constitutes what
is known in
Good luck.
===
=
Arun Kaore kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au on 06/16/99 08:18:53 PM
Please respond to Arun Kaore kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Hi Treg
Barry! good to see you in text coming through the Ether. You said sorry, I
was wrong but you have a definition Earth and Magneto. This is the same as my
Earth and Make to Battery!
I rest my case m'lord.
I do believe Ear and Mouth are the most commonly used words but maybe not the
Hello Lou,
A one stop hit site for a world wide listing of EMC standards is a very good
idea!!
Australia and New Zealand have adopted generally all IEC/CISPR and
IEC/CENELEC standards in their original form and these standards are
published as AS/NZS ..Number eg. CISPR 22 is AS/NZS 3548.
Hello Peter,
I hope I can add some usefull information:
here is a really matching link:
http://www.mpt.go.jp/policyreports/english/misc/Radio-Equipment/certific
ation-procedures.html
Best regards
Winfried Pohl
CETECOM ICT Services GmbH
Tel.: +49 681 598 8110
Fax: +49 681 598 8775
email
Korea (KOLAS) is a signatory of APLAC (Asia Pacific Laboratory
Accreditation Cooperation) along with the United States (NVLAP and A2LA).
It is my understanding that, in the near future, this will change the way
Korean approvals are done. I am not sure of the
details...can
APLAC Mutual Recognition Agreement MR002 (1997) is available at:
http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/210/214/214.htm
Further details including implementation schedule are available
from NVLAP and A2LA.
Mirko Matejic
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [SMTP:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent:
Dear Robert,
You need to refer to the APEC MRA documents and also country specific
documents/rules on how they are implementing the various phases of this
MRA.. Not all APEC members signed the MRA but one of them is Korea. The APEC
MRA can be found at http://www.tsacc.ic.gc.ca/MRA/;. The
13 matches
Mail list logo
