Raymond,
A good starting point for european legislation hunting is
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/search.html
I recommend you set quite definite search criteria otherwise you will be
swamped.
Regards,
Jerry Roberton
NET Europe Ltd, UK
raymond...@dixonsasia.com.hk wrote:
Hi folks,
Can
No, No, No, No, No, Surely it's a simple pressure vessel!
Regards
Ian
Peter Merguerian wrote:
Cortland,
I suspect that your bike inner tube complies with the Toy Directive.
Or could it be the Machinery Directive? (grin) - it may have been
assessed as having moving parts! Would be very
Hi folks,
Can anyone advise me where I can obtain the information on the new EEC
electronic waste legistration to be implemented in 2002.
Thanks,
Raymond Li
Dixons Asia Ltd.
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to
As much as I'd like to take credit (for all good ideas), it was Scott
Lacey's idea t use the bubble pack. Previously I thought it was only
good for making designers panic when they are testing a new power supply
and you sneak up behind them and pop a few bubbles!
Jim
-Original
Hi All,
Jim has a good idea here. I have an experiment I use in presentations that
shows the amount of an ESD current that couples onto a probe body (Fischer
F-33-1) varies by about a factor of two depending how the lead is dressed
as it passes through the probe, perpendicular through the center
Brent,
Good idea. I have used making tape to form a thick collar around the cable
insulation. This takes time, but provides very repeatable measurements
(positioning).
I did this with a Fischer F-2000 probe, which has a small diameter hole.
Jim
Jim,
I too have played with a sliding probe to find peaks and nulls on cables.
Typically this is for diagnostics purposes only. In order to minimize some
of the uncertainty I will typically place one or two ferrite toroidal cores
on the coaxial cable leaving the current probe as a common mode
Wrapping a strip of bubble pack around the cable a few time is also an easy
way to keep it centered in the clamp.
Brent
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Lacey,Scott
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 11:47 AM
Jim,
I have experience using current probes on cables carrying differential
digital signals at 500 MHz and above.
I find that standing waves are ALWAYS present on the shield of the cable,
even when the signal circuits are matched (at least as well as practical).
Most of the following experience
David,
I would like to add one remark about some past messages on this discussion
group. EN 61000-3-2 contains limits for professional equipment. This
category applies to medical equipment and any other products used in the
workplace or in manufacturing activities.
I would like to clarify
Hello all - can anyone tell me which of the EN 61000-4- (immunity)
documents apply to telecommunications terminal equipment ? Thanks in
advance for your help.
Cal Whiteley
Patton Electronics Co.
Gaithersburg, MD
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your
In my opinion, letting the cable insulation touch the probe body is never a
good idea. I always try to shim the cable and probe in order to center the
cable within the probe opening. The trick is to keep the shims outside of
the probe. A good trick is to make a V block out of wood, with a deeper
Re: comment 3: ... This process maintains the INTENT of the
emissions spec in the first place - that is to maintain a KNOWN level of
interference. That is not the itent. The intent is to protect radio
reception betwen 30 - 1000 MHz(now extended to 6500 MHz). Knowing that
the level is
Hello,
I am trying to quantify the pollution degree at one of our installations.
It is an industrial environment and it is suspected that there is some
quantity of airborne conductive contaminants. Does anyone know if there is
a device or a process that would be useful in determining the amount
Hello everyone.
Does IEC 1000-3-2/EN 61000-3-2 apply to ITE? As I understand it, compliance
to EN 55022 and EN 55024 is sufficient for emissions and immunity for ITE,
and they don't call out EN 61000-3-2. Am I right?
Thank you,
David Gelfand
Memotec Communications
Montreal Canada
-
Bill and all who asked for copies of the US National Committee position
paper:
The paper is attached. The same paper is presented in Word and Adobe
format. I would be happy to try and answer any questions. We would like to
think we can get more company support and support from company
Brian, in the EU all pacemakers must comply with the immunity requirements
of EN50061/A1:1995. There are no real requirements in the US.
Pacemakers must not malfunction when a 1V peak to peak sine signal with a
frequency range of 20 Hz-500 Hz is applied to a tissue interface simulation
circuit
Updated for Slovenia and China.
cert.pdf
cert.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
18 matches
Mail list logo
