From: Douglas Beckwith@MITEL on 08/31/2001 04:59 PM
The standards for North America are CSA C22.2No60950-00 or UL60950-00. The
standard for Europe is EN60950. I suggest that you get a CB scheme report and
certificate for other parts of the world.
Doug Beckwith
Mitel Networks
David Heald
I read in !emc-pstc that Lesmeister, Glenn glenn.lesmeis...@compaq.com
wrote (in 31891b757c09184bbfec5275f85d5595fd8...@cceexc18.americas.cpqc
orp.net) about 'EN 61000-3-3', on Fri, 31 Aug 2001:
However, the new annex B
that defines the test clearly indicates in the introduction (B.1) that the
I read in !emc-pstc that Joshua Wiseman jwise...@printronix.com wrote
(in f503cb4657afd4119b9400508bb0d654013af...@irvmail.printronix.com)
about 'EN 61000-3-3', on Fri, 31 Aug 2001:
I have recently heard of a requirement in the Flicker standard for In Rush
current measurements.
My understanding
I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris chris.col...@tagmclaren.com
wrote (in AE0F4BD08FEAD211895900805FE67B1FD6CACF@CAT) about 'EN 60335
- test lab and toilets', on Fri, 31 Aug 2001:
I have seen a NEMKO symbol on an electric hand drier, try them. They have
an office in the UK.
If you do, please
Joshua,
This is indeed the test method and it is in the amendment to 61000-3-3.
It has been suggested that this new requirement is intended to specifically
address inrush current because the original standard was unclear about
this and there was no specific test method for it. However, the
Hi all,
I have recently heard of a requirement in the Flicker standard for In Rush
current measurements.
My understanding of the test is that the EUT is manually turned on and off
24 times. During these times dmax is measured. You then take the highest and
lowest readings and throw them out. You
Forwarded for Eric Meunier
Original Message
Subject: RE: LVD testing suite for ITE devices
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:08:34 -0400
From: Meunier, Ériceric.meun...@ca.kontron.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
For Ethernet ports you may also
FYI,
The following excerpt from CSA website is being forwarded and should not
be construed as an endorsement by either myself or my employer.
Paul J. Smith, Teradyne Inc., Boston
http://directories.csa-international.org/
Introducing CSA's
Jasmine,
There have been some proposed revisions to the PPW Directive in the works
over the past few months. Perhaps the rumor you are dealing with is part of
one of the change proposals.
Lauren Crane
* Regional Manager for Machinery Evaluation
* TÜV Product Service \ TÜV America
*
I have seen a NEMKO symbol on an electric hand drier, try them. They have
an office in the UK.
http://www.nemko.co.uk
Chris Colgan
Compliance Engineer
TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
*Tel: +44 (0)1480 415 627
*Fax: +44 (0)1480 52159
*
I read in !emc-pstc that Jasmine TAN sb...@ctl.creative.com wrote (in
off13d2f66.e05086dc-on48256ab9.001f8...@ctlsg.creaf.com) about
'Packaging Weight', on Fri, 31 Aug 2001:
Our Europe company has feedback that there is a new EU directive stating
that any packaging box that is greater than 23kg,
Ned,
I agree with you except for one point. Most ac/dc convertors are
encapsulated. Therefore no internal claearances or creepages. Most likely
the external clearance/creepage of 5.0/8.0mm betwen the primary and
secondary pins will be met. The IEC 601/UL2601-1 does not have a requirement
for
Can anyone point me in the direction of any standards that would cover the
electromagnetic immunity requirements for cardiac pacemakers?
The focus of my interest is for pacemakers that are likely to be found in
Hong Kong or southern China.
The closest I've found with my own hunting so far
Hi group,
This is out of the scope of EMC-PSTC, but I'm out of resources and in
urgent need of advice.
Our Europe company has feedback that there is a new EU directive stating
that any packaging box that is greater than 23kg, needs to have it's weight
indicated on the outerbox.
But not able to
14 matches
Mail list logo
