Re: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread SOUNDSURFR
Greg I think your statement needs some clarification. Even if it is produced by Company A, the DoC must clearly state the name and model number of the Company B which sells the product in question in the EU, so that the document is clearly and specifically associated with that product as sold in

Re: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread SOUNDSURFR
In a message dated 11/6/02 4:42:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, gui...@cae.com writes: For the European law, company B is considered as manufacturer and shall issue the DoC. No point company A issues its own DoC. I don't think that's entirely correct. I think it depends on the relationship

Re: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread John Allen
Greg I think your statement needs some clarification. Even if it is produced by Company A, the DoC must clearly state the name and model number of the Company B which sells the product in question in the EU, so that the document is clearly and specifically associated with that product as sold

RE: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread Alexandru Guidea
For the European law, company B is considered as manufacturer and shall issue the DoC. No point company A issues its own DoC. The text of the EMC Directive reads the manufacturer may subcontract certain operations, e.g., apparatus design or production, provided that he retains overall control

Re: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8 4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A0467594A@flbocexu05) about 'EU DoC' on Wed, 6 Nov 2002: Company A builds a device for company B which sells the device in the EU under their own brand name. The device is subject to a Declaration of

Re: STOP-ocoss

2002-11-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote (in oleokfnbajjejfkplbbmoepaceaa.g.grem...@cetest.nl) about 'STOP-ocoss' on Wed, 6 Nov 2002: Could we please remain ON-topic ? Docopocoss is extremely on-topic. It arose here as a result of people being confused about when

RE: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread Peter Merguerian
Rich, Since company B puts the device into service under their own brand name, they are the only ones that need to hold the DoC.] Best Regards, Peter Merguerian -Original Message- From: richwo...@tycoint.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Sent: 11/6/02 8:22 PM Subject: EU DoC

Re: docopocoss

2002-11-06 Thread Jacob Schanker
John: The way I have been pronouncing DOCOPOCOSS, it almost rhymes with HOCUS POCUS, which I judge is more ironical than poetical (sic). Regards, Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E. 65 Crandon Way Rochester, NY 14618 Tel: 585 442 3909 Fax: 585 442 2182 j.schan...@ieee.org - Original Message -

RE: STOP-ocoss

2002-11-06 Thread Gert Gremmen
Could we please remain ON-topic ? The number of empty content contributions to this group exceeds the acceptable. A small joke at the end of a serious discussion and even political smalltalk (if related to the subject) is fun, stimulates discussion and is no waste of my mailbox. When the

Re: EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread SOUNDSURFR
Company A builds a device for company B which sells the device in the EU under their own brand name. The device is subject to a Declaration of Conformity, and both companies are located within the EU. Must both companies issue a Declaration? No. A declaration from either company will suffice.

Re: docopocoss

2002-11-06 Thread Don_Borowski
John- I know you invented the word, and thus have first claim on it. But I was putting the accent on the penultimate syllable, making it much easier to rhyme. Don Borowski John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk@majordomo.ieee.org on 11/06/2002 09:03:51 AM Please respond to John Woodgate

EU DoC

2002-11-06 Thread richwoods
Company A builds a device for company B which sells the device in the EU under their own brand name. The device is subject to a Declaration of Conformity, and both companies are located within the EU. Must both companies issue a Declaration? Richard Woods Sensormatic Electronics Tyco

Re: docopocoss

2002-11-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Price, Ed ed.pr...@cubic.com wrote (in b78135310217d511907c0090273f5190d0b...@curly.ds.cubic.com) about 'docopocoss' on Wed, 6 Nov 2002: Maybe we could come to admire DOCOPOCOSS more if we could rhyme it with something. It's very difficult to get a true rhyme for

RE: docopocoss

2002-11-06 Thread Price, Ed
-Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:01 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: docopocoss I read in !emc-pstc that Price, Ed ed.pr...@cubic.com wrote (in

Re: Networked digital video equipment

2002-11-06 Thread Eric Petitpierre
Chet, A couple of key questions: 1. How will your equipment be used? Is it to be used within a telephone central office ( CCTV) or is it to be used at a broadcast station? 2. Who will be the customer of your equipment? 3. Who will be performing servicing? If you can say your company, or

Rif: Re: Measuring AC Line Impedance

2002-11-06 Thread Paolo Peruzzi
I think Don is right: the resistive load measurement is not useful; yo need to measure the e.m.f. and to perform two reactive load measurements in order to solve the equations. - ESAOTE S.p.A. Paolo Peruzzi Research

RE: Mercury and Europe

2002-11-06 Thread Crabb, John
Annex ZC (Informative) A-Deviations, in EN 60950-1, states Clause 1.5.1 Deviation Sweden (Ordinance 1990:944) Add the following: NOTE In Sweden, switches containing mercury such as thermostats, relays and level controllers are not allowed. Switzerland (Ordinance on environmentally hazardous

RE: Medical Devices Environmental Requirements

2002-11-06 Thread Peter Merguerian
Joel Hello! I do not know the use of your medical device really does. But there are various types of standards which you can use. We recently evaluated a medical device which was worn on the wrist and which transmitted radio signals to a base station much like a cellular telephone. For

Mercury and Europe

2002-11-06 Thread Neil Helsby
Mercury, lead and the other forbidden substances, will be banned in Europe from July 2006. This decision came from the agreements made in the reconciliation process on the WEEE and ROHS Directives completed on the 11th October 2002. As usual, there are a few exceptions. For mercury this

Re: Medical Devices Environmental Requirements

2002-11-06 Thread Alan E Hutley
Have you tried http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/medical_devices/index.htm Cheers Alan E Hutley EMC Compliance Journal www.compliance-club.com - Original Message - From: Jim Conrad jc...@shore.net To: Naftali Shani nsh...@catena.com; 'Mandel, Joel' joel_man...@adc.com;

Networked digital video equipment

2002-11-06 Thread Summers, Chet
Hello, I am looking for a concise and up to date source of information regarding the agency compliance approval process of networked digital equipment. Specifically, digital video recorders, video switches and the like. Where can I find a framework for standards applicability? Does the

Re: Measuring AC Line Impedance

2002-11-06 Thread Don_Borowski
John- I was afraid that things were getting long and confusing. The Part 1 and Part 2 comments in my reply refer to the posting immediately below mine. But to answer your fundamental objection. It is indeed true that if we place a resistive and capacitive load, measure voltage amplitude AND