Certification process for 802.11B China, Chile and Brazil?

2003-04-17 Thread rlinf...@sonicwall.com
Hello (again) World Wide Regulatory Knowledge Base, What are the regulatory/certification requirements if any for Wireless LAN (2.4 GHz) 802.11B in China, Brazil and Chile? RICK LINFORD rlinf...@sonicwall.com This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee

Re: EN61010-1, Symbol 14

2003-04-17 Thread ggars...@us.tuv.com
:--) Plus, isn't Chinese the most-spoken language in the world? [I am sure I will be corrected if wrong!] ;--) So having everyone else change to Chinese would inconvenience the least number of people? best regards, glyn This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety

RE: Brazil Telecom Homologations

2003-04-17 Thread peter merguerian
Jeffrey, For South American Approvals or any International Approvals, there are two EXPERTS you can contact at TUV Rheinland in Pleasanton, as follows: Ms. Joyce E. Nixon International Approvals Coordinator TUV Rheinland of North America Telecom Division 1279 Quarry Lane, Suite A

RE: Q. on responsible party for FCC CLass B

2003-04-17 Thread Grasso, Charles
Thanks to all that replied. One comment: I looked at a manual from a similar product and in their manual ONLY the Manf name and address is listed. They did NOT include a person or a title. I guess that was the thrust of my question. I am trying to understand the details of the requirement. Is

Re: Q. on responsible party for FCC CLass B

2003-04-17 Thread John Barnes
Charles, The FCC requires the responsible party for compliance to be located in the US. Thus the responsible party will be: * Responsible for every unit that is marketed. * The manufacturer, if they are located in the US. * An importer who brings the units into the US. * An assembler in the

Bulk current injection method for CS101

2003-04-17 Thread Low, Aaron S
I am wondering if any of you have had experience using a current probe to inject current into a power line for a modified MIL-STD-461 CS101 test? I am trying to envision how I am going to run CS101 on a 150 Amp system without blowing up the test equipment amplifiers. I cannot use two identical

Re: Q. on responsible party for FCC CLass B

2003-04-17 Thread Jacob Schanker
Charles: When I was doing compliance for an employer, I always used my name, as Director of Regulatory Compliance. That way, any FCC correspondence would come to me instead of being lost on the desk of some executive who was clueless as to what the correspondence meant. Regards, Jacob Z.

Lightning coordination in K.20 (2000) versus GR-1089

2003-04-17 Thread j...@aol.com
Hello All: I have been studying the new 2000 edition of K.20, Resistibility of Telecommunication Equipment Installed in a Telecommunication Centre to Overvoltages and Overcurrents. There appears to be an important change from the previous edition that will have a big impact on line interface

Re: EN61010-1, Symbol 14

2003-04-17 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Pete Perkins peperkin...@cs.com wrote (in 01c304f8$70d7d7a0$78d5c6ac@oemcomputer) about 'EN61010-1, Symbol 14' on Thu, 17 Apr 2003: As an alternative, perhaps this group would work on the use of a universal, worldwide language (English, for instance) which would take

Q. on responsible party for FCC CLass B

2003-04-17 Thread Grasso, Charles
Hi all, The FCC requires the name and address for the responsible party. (akin to the EU signatory for the DoC) . Who would that be?? Best Regards Charles Grasso Senior Compliance Engineer Echostar Communications Corp. Tel: 303-706-5467 Fax: 303-799-6222 Cell: 303-204-2974 Email:

Re: EN61010-1, Symbol 14

2003-04-17 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Richard: As you say, this web site provides a discussion on the exclamation symbol. However, the discussion is slanted in one direction that not everyone in the safety fraternity would necessarily subscribe to. For instance, I have seen the 'high voltage flash' sign used as a

RE: Brazil Telecom Homologations

2003-04-17 Thread Pettit, Ghery
Jeff, One possible contact is: Benjamim Da Silva Medeiros c. Galvao EMC Manager Integration and Testing Laboratory Instituto Nacional De Pesquisas Espaciais benja...@lit.inpe.br (e-mail) (55) 12 3945-6275 (phone) (55) 12 3941-1884 (fax) The Brazilian space agency EMC lab doesn't test very many

RE: EN61010-1, Symbol 14

2003-04-17 Thread Pete Perkins
Richard, et al; The use of 'universal' markings continues to be controversial. In order for markings to be universally accepted there needs to be considerable training as to the correct interpretation as to what the symbol means. This has been confirmed by several studies. Adding any

re: EN61010-1, Symbol 14

2003-04-17 Thread richhug...@aol.com
Rich, As you say, this web site provides a discussion on the exclamation symbol. However, the discussion is slanted in one direction that not everyone in the safety fraternity would necessarily subscribe to. For instance, I have seen the 'high voltage flash' sign used as a symbol in an

Northeast Product Safety Society Meeting Next Week on Wednesday, April 23

2003-04-17 Thread Matt Campanella
All, There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society meeting next week on Wednesday, April 23rd, at EMC Corporation's Customer Briefing Center at 42 South Street in Hopkinton, MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at 7:00 PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. This

RE: Brazil Telecom Homologations

2003-04-17 Thread Collins, Jeffrey
Group, Are you aware of any changes in Brazil telecom requirements effective in August of 2003, that will require: Conducted Emissions on the Telecom ports ? I'm currently using Res. 237 Nov 2002 for Cat-3 Equipment. ( EMC emissions and Conducted emissions on the Pwr Line) Also, can anyone