So what is the bottom line? Are there or are there not limits for Europe
(EN 55022) above a gig?
I have copies of both BS EN 55022:2006 and BS EN 55022:2006 +A1:2007
Incorporating corrigendum no. 1. Both standards have a section 6.2 and both
standards have limits from 1 to 6 GHz. BS EN 55022:2006
Ghery, are you saying that the BS version has the error and was withdrawn?
If so we were not notified of this action by British Standards. We get
their standards through their subscription service.
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax:
BSMI (Taiwan), the publisher for the CNS 13438, is more likely to follow the
VCCI's time frame for the site requirement above 1 GHz.
Grace
On 10/29/08, Larry Stillings la...@complianceworldwide.com wrote:
Currently Australia / New Zealand and VCCI have put a tempory stay on
We likewise were never notified that the BS version was withdrawn, if that is
the case. It's rather disturbing to think that we may be paying money for and
following standards that are wrong.
Jim Hulbert, Group Leader
TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering
Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive,
In message
72b8947772cf0948adaa9853631663fb20c833e...@pbi-namsg-02.mgdpbi.global.pv
t, dated Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Jim Hulbert jim.hulb...@pb.com writes:
We likewise were never notified that the BS version was withdrawn, if
that is the case. It's rather disturbing to think that we may be
paying
just one more comment. The AS/NZS CISPR 22:2006 edition does have the limits
published in their version, as I have a copy
Larry Stillings
Compliance Worldwide, Inc.
From: Flavin, John [mailto:john.fla...@teradata.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:20 PM
Thanks Lauren.
Our product is a laboratory equipment product so it is evaluated to UL/IEC/EN
61010-1 for safety. Turned out our customer is using our product to do some
process on their factory floor (not what it was intended to be used for). The
customer hired a third party inspector who
Colleagues -
I have been encouraged to record in a final email what I have discovered with
your help in my search for reliability data, so that future searches of the
EMC-PSTC archive will turn up the references. The
reliability/probability-of-failure figures are needed to allow calculations
Greetings IEEE EMC-PSTC forum members and experts.
I am looking to answer some questions concerning the EMC testing of portable
commercial and industrial equipment; specifically the testing of motors at
“no load”.
I have my own “opinions” and experience concerning these questions but I
Does any one have the pin configurations on the NARDA 8633 probes or the
8716 monitors? Any details to help get this set working would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Doug
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website:
Curtis:
For the testing of Military systems, I always look for the worst possible, yet
normal mode of operation. Sometimes a power supply will be noisier at little
load than at high load, so we usually test it at 10%, 50% and 100% loading.
Electromechanical devices are operated as close to
Does anyone know the current status of the release of the latest revision of
ANSI C63.4?
It was still in comment phase during the Symposium in Detroit but was expected
to publish this year I believe.
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[] Motorola Confidential Restricted (MCR),
[ X ] Motorola
That is correct. It was quickly withdrawn and reissued without the limits
above 1 GHz. I'm still waiting for my updated copy from Global, too. :-)
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:54 AM
To: Pettit, Ghery
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE:
This isn't an ad, just info about a test hardware resource. All the usual
disclaimers. I'm sending this as an FYI to owners of old HP spectrum or
network analyzers.
I have an HP-8562A spectrum analyzer that is a very valued resource, but the
display CRT is nearing the end of its life (it's dim
14 matches
Mail list logo
