Re: [PSES] NEC vs CEC for Transformer Protection

2015-03-28 Thread Brian Oconnell
Inrush peak for 50/60Hz transformers mostly from magnetizing current - core saturation and residual flux, and of course input V. As the saturation curve does not extend past the pi/2 inrush peak, any further inrush past a few mSec is typically from filling up the coulomb buckets on the

[PSES] NEC vs CEC for Transformer Protection

2015-03-28 Thread Richard Nute
Hi Brian: I can't help you with the CEC. Both the NEC and CEC are quite wrong to specify overcurrent protection as a function of rated input current. Overcurrent protection is protection for fault condition current, which is not a function of rated input current. The fuse value is always

Re: [PSES] NEC vs CEC for Transformer Protection

2015-03-28 Thread Gary Tornquist
Hi Rich, You mention the failure modes of a mains frequency transformer. I'd expect the same applies to switch mode high frequency transformer, or is there something else to consider? A good article! - I just skimmed it :). Cheers, Gary Tornquist Microsoft From: Richard Nute

Re: [PSES] NEC vs CEC for Transformer Protection

2015-03-28 Thread John Woodgate
In message 000201d06978$5f687e60$1e397b20$@ieee.org, dated Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Richard Nute ri...@ieee.org writes: Thermally-caused insulation failure can be controlled by a fuse in the primary.  Load the secondary and measure the insulation temperature.  I think you have to reduce the load

Re: [PSES] Quasi Peak - Length of Measurement Time for Final Spot Measurement?

2015-03-28 Thread Richard Marshall
Admittedly it is out of context (and refers to impulsive, wide band, emission) but you might use the precedent of CISPR14 Emission . Household Appliances, electric tools and similar apparatus which has a section 4.2 covering Discontinuous Disturbances. It is worth a look - but too detailed