This thread has digressed quite a bit... Allow me to add to it!
3M makes something called the Opticom System. It is a traffic management
device that really helps emergency vehicles make their way thru heavy
traffic...
Here's an article that summarizes it nicely:
The source may be differential, but common mode currents generally
contribute much more to radiated emissions, especially with cables... It
sounds like you have cable radiation (100MHz) as well as maybe slot
radiation (600MHz)... Tell us more about your device's test setup... (i.e.
chassis and
The table on this page is a pretty good reference:
http://www.voltageconverters.com/voltageguide.htm
http://www.voltageconverters.com/voltageguide.htm
Paul Hare e: ph...@pirus.com
Compliance Engineer w: 978.206.9179
Pirus Networks f: 978.206.9199
43 Nagog Park
Are you sure? Berylium Oxide (BeO) has a long-standing reputation for
being
toxic, but I've never heard of metalic berylium (Be) posing a problem.
See the following for more details:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts4.html
Paul Hare e: ph...@pirus.com
Compliance Engineer w:
I second that recommendation. I also have the solutions for the exercises
in chapters two through sixteen if anyone is interested. Email me directly
and I'll forward them to you...
Paul Hare e: ph...@pirus.com
Compliance Engineer w: 978.206.9179
Pirus Networks f:
Alex, make sure you investigate whether or not energy is coupling to other
cables of the EUT and causing problems. In other words, try to reduce the
system (remove cables) and see if the EFT failures persist. If you can't
remove a cable due to functionality, place ferrites on it instead (near
Stuart,
As a side note, I've seen an FCC application where the second harmonic of
the device was measured and reported to be at the limit (i.e. 54 dBuV/m).
Since the second harmonic was the closest to the limit, the transmitter's
power had been increased to a point at which there was zero
Brian,
As of August 1, 2001, EN 60742:1995 should not be used for presumption of
conformity to the LVD. EN61558-2-6:1997 supercedes it.
The last date of mfr is unimportant. The date which the xfrmrs are placed
on the market determines which standards to use in order to demonstrate
FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARDS
See following page for details...
http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/standards/fips/fips140-1/fips1401.htm
Paul Hare e: ph...@pirus.com
Compliance Engineer w: 978.206.9179
Pirus Networks f: 978.206.9199
43 Nagog Park
This is from the Panasonic Battery Disposal Guidelines webpage with respect
to Lithium-ion battery disposal in the US:
All Panasonic Lithium Ion batteries are classified by the federal
government as non-hazardous waste and are safe for disposal in the normal
municipal waste stream.
Hello group,
I am in the process of specifying detachable AC cordsets for European
distribution of my product. It uses an autoranging power supply
(100-240VAC) and is rated for 12 A max with a C14 appliance coupler. I
initially thought this would be a trivial task of matching plug and
The whole truth
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/ninezeropound.htm
Paul Hare e: ph...@pirus.com
Compliance Engineer w: 978.206.9179
Pirus Networks f: 978.206.9199
43 Nagog Park c: 508.450.0376
Acton, MA 01720 i: www.pirus.com
-Original
I use an outside vendor to assemble various cable harnesses for my products.
The vendor is recognized by UL and CSA and undergoes quarterly audits. I
supply a drawing that specifies certain components (e.g. Connector X, Line
Filter Y). However, I leave it up to them to use whatever UL/CSA
13 matches
Mail list logo