**
Gary Stuyvenberg
Sr. EMC Engineer
Thompson Consulting
On Wed, 4/4/18, John Woodgate<j...@woodjohn.uk> <mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards
per RED for 13.
Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per
RED for 13.56 MHz RFID
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2018, 3:59 PM
As is usual with these things, about 20% of the words are justified, the rest are not, or vice versa.
For exa
org/wiki/International_Commission_on_Non-Ionizing_Radiation_Protection
***
Gary Stuyvenberg
Sr. EMC Engineer
Thompson Consulting
On Wed, 4/4/18, John Woodgate <j...@woodjohn.uk> wrote:
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Stand
As is usual with these things, about 20% of the words are justified, the
rest are not, or vice versa. For example, in the first citation, the
first 7 words are not justified by any peer-reviewed research reports,
the rest are largely true. In the second citation, the first 14 words
are
Re: Exposure Limits
Thought I would post this to the group as it has been the subject of debate for
many years. I found it Interesting as it gets into the mechanisms at work and
symptoms while underscoring the importance of our work.
Gary Stuyvenberg
Sr. EMC Engineer
Thompson Consulting
April 2018 16:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for 13.56 MHz
RFID
Yes, I cited the wrong Directive. Wrong citations are quite common, due to the
Commission and the SMBs citing the largely me
:44
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for 13.56 MHz
RFID
Yes, well, it's typical obscurantist wording. The LVD DOES apply, but without
its low-voltage limit. That is what Article 3 1 (a) says, quite explicitly.
John Woodgate OOO
ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED
for 13.56 MHz RFID
Yes, I cited the wrong Directive. Wrong citations are quite common,
due to the Commission and the SMBs citing the largely meaningless
'/nn' numbers instead of the titles of the Directives.
. The actu
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for 13.56 MHz
RFID
Yes, well, it's typical obscurantist wording. The LVD DOES apply, but without
its low-voltage limit. That is what Article 3 1 (a) says, quite explicitly.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions
uk>
*Sent:* 04 April 2018 16:05
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for
13.56 MHz RFID
Yes, I cited the wrong Directive. Wrong citations are quite common,
due to the Commission and the SMBs citing the largely meaningless
'
%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
*From:*John Woodgate <j...@woodjohn.uk>
*Sent:* 04 April 2018 16:05
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for
13.56 MHz RFID
Yes, I cited the wrong Dire
%2f>
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
From: John Woodgate <j...@woodjohn.uk>
Sent: 04 April 2018 16:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for 13.56 MHz
RFID
Yes, I cited the wrong Directive. Wrong citations are quite
As LVD (2014/35) is not applicable for Radio devices and so RFID, this
standard is set up to be harmonized
under the RED. Be it as an Electrical Safety Standard under the RED.
Look at the provided link.
Gert Gremmen
On 4-4-2018 15:37, John Woodgate wrote:
SECOND RESPONSE
I should have
te [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
*Sent:* 04 April 2018 14:38
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for
13.56 MHz RFID
SECOND RESPONSE
I should have mentioned that exposure standards have nothing to do
with RED but are relevant to a differe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:38:41 -0700,
Grace Lin wrote:
> Is there any harmonized standards applicable to 13.56 MHz RFID devices?
>
> The following four standards are listed in the latest published list
> standards (March 9, 2018). It seems there is no one applicable to a
orate office phone: USA: (+1) 703 847 4700
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 04 April 2018 14:38
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for 13.56 MHz
RFID
SECOND RESPONSE
I should ha
SECOND RESPONSE
I should have mentioned that exposure standards have nothing to do with
RED but are relevant to a different Directive:
DIRECTIVE 2013/35/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 26 June 2013
on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of
t;graceli...@gmail.com>
Sent: 04 April 2018 13:39
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EU Harmonized RF Exposure Standards per RED for 13.56 MHz RFID
Dear Members,
Is there any harmonized standards applicable to 13.56 MHz RFID devices?
The following four standards are listed in the late
Dear Members,
Is there any harmonized standards applicable to 13.56 MHz RFID devices?
The following four standards are listed in the latest published list
standards (March 9, 2018). It seems there is no one applicable to a 13.56
MHz RFID device.
EN 50360:2017 Product standard to demonstrate
19 matches
Mail list logo