Re: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

2002-02-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that geor...@lexmark.com wrote (in 200202061341.IAA 00...@interlock2.lexmark.com) about 'Compliance After Repairs in the Field', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002: Our products range in price from $50 to $10K. The low end units have no service plan, only dispose and replace. All of the

RE: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

2002-02-06 Thread Allen, John
. -Original Message- From: Anderson Cheng (TPE) [mailto:anderson_ch...@htc.com.tw] Sent: 06 February 2002 02:59 To: 'marti...@appliedbiosystems.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Compliance After Repairs in the Field If products required to have 100% production-line tests

Re: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

2002-02-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that marti...@appliedbiosystems.com wrote (in of6ced213d.bf9618d9-on88256b57.00806...@pe-c.com) about 'Compliance After Repairs in the Field', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002: We are a manufacturer of Laboratory Equipment. We evaluate our products to UL 3101-1, CSA 1010.0 and EN 61010.

RE: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

2002-02-06 Thread Anderson Cheng (TPE)
If products required to have 100% production-line tests (such as Hi-pot and Ground Continuity tests), then I required that tests should be made in the field after repairs. I think it at least benefits checking out the minimum safety constructions are still functioning well. Regards, Anderson