, August 07, 2001 1:19 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: RE: ETSI EMC Standard
>
>
> Regarding the change in the standard, has anyone started to look into an
> upgrade to their compact chambers for stre-e-e-etching the frequency to 2
> GHz? If so, what
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 12:13:38 +0200
To: umbdenst...@sensormatic.com
From: Paolo Gemma
Subject: RE: ETSI EMC Standard
I am involved in ETSI
The change was drive by IEC 61000-4-3 that approved this modification to
the basic standards.
A similar change is also in the ETSI standards EN 300 386
Woods
--
From: umbdenst...@sensormatic.com
[SMTP:umbdenst...@sensormatic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:20 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: ETSI EMC Standard
Regarding the change in the standard, has anyone started to look
in
Regarding the change in the standard, has anyone started to look into an
upgrade to their compact chambers for stre-e-e-etching the frequency to 2
GHz? If so, what upgrades did you find most cost effective for
* signal generator
* amplifier
* antenna
* sensor
* e-f
4 matches
Mail list logo
