David Sproul wrote:
> I can only answer with my own opinion which will probably be
> both backed up and refuted by others who may respond.
> First of all, military equipment does not have to be CE
> marked, unless that has been changed very recently.
> However if the equipment has to go to
If anyone want an EOE version of Geoff Hoones policy statement for the UK
MoD then please email me direct.
John Allen
From: David Sproul [mailto:david.spr...@alexanderlynn.co.uk]
Sent: 11 November 2003 22:35
To: John Allen
Subject: RE: More CE mark issues...
Hi John,
Yes you are absolutely
I read in !emc-pstc that David Sproul
wrote (in ) about 'More CE mark issues...' on Tue, 11 Nov 2003:
>As you will be aware, a recent string in this group has been discussing
>when to CE mark and when not. I will dare to suggest that since without
>the ATE your IA is an expensive paperweight,
nd Safety Engineering
ERA Technology Ltd.
Cleeve Road
Leatherhead
Surrey KT22 7SA
UK
Tel: +44-1372-367025 (Direct)
+44-1372-367000 (Switchboard)
Fax: +44-1372-367102
From: David Sproul [mailto:david.spr...@alexanderlynn.co.uk]
Sent: 11 November 2003 13:21
To: Coleman, David
Cc: EMC-PSTC
I read in !emc-pstc that Coleman, David
wrote (in <7103C9D213EBD111971400104B496814EA3D53@ntexch-
f.racalinst.co.uk>) about 'More CE mark issues...' on Tue, 11 Nov 2003:
>From an EMC point of view, as they are passive and a
>component of a larger system (the ATE), the EMC directive need not
>ap
In a message dated 11/11/2003 3:51:21 AM Central Standard Time,
david.cole...@racalinst.co.uk writes:
My company designs and manufactures ATE systems and components for the
Military, Aerospace and Functional test markets. Often what we are supplying
is just an interface adapter (IA) that sits betw
o.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Coleman, David
Cc: EMC-PSTC
Subject: RE: More CE mark issues...
Hi David,
I can only answer with my own opinion which will probably be both backed up
and refuted by others who may respond.
First of all, military equipment does not have to be
Hi David,
I can only answer with my own opinion which will probably be both backed up
and refuted by others who may respond.
First of all, military equipment does not have to be CE marked, unless that
has been changed very recently. However if the equipment has to go to
Germany, they apparently i
Dave,
Firstly you need to decide what EU directives apply. This may sound a little
obvious, but the LVD (for example) excludes equipment from its scope if these
are covered by other regulatory provisions. Such considerations could apply
to your military and aerospace products. The same would als
9 matches
Mail list logo
