RE: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals

2000-07-28 Thread Scott Lacey
Joe, First, use Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) for the actual manuals. This is rapidly becoming the defacto world standard for on-line documentation. You can link to them from .html web pages easily. You can also burn them onto a CD-ROM if you need to include manuals with the product. Acrobat has a

RE: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals

2000-07-28 Thread Bandele Adepoju
...@worldwidepackets.com Cc: dick.grob...@medgraph.com; marti...@appliedbiosystems.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals Safety standards specify topics which must be addressed in manuals. Only those portions of the manual addressing those specific safety topics

Re: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals

2000-07-28 Thread Rich Nute
Safety standards specify topics which must be addressed in manuals. Only those portions of the manual addressing those specific safety topics are controlled by the certifier. The remainder of the manual is controlled by the product manufacturer; this remainder may be provided in any

RE: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals

2000-07-28 Thread Gary McInturff
the solution to them Gary -Original Message- From: Dick Grobner [mailto:dick.grob...@medgraph.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 6:18 AM To: 'marti...@appliedbiosystems.com' Cc: IEEE EMC-PSTC E-Mail Forum (E-mail) Subject:RE: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals We have played

RE: UL Acceptance of On-Line Manuals

2000-07-28 Thread Dick Grobner
We have played with the idea but have consistently talked ourselves out of it. Reasons have been: - the ability to read the manuals (one also needs to provide a copy of some sort of reader software such as Adobe) - Revision control is a concern along with the cost. - Our manuals are quite