, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Gary McInturff
Cc: john.al...@era.co.uk; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: product safety audit scenario
Hi Gary:
Your comment triggers another comment: Leadership.
Typically, we tend to let the inspector be the
leader for the duration of the inspection.
The host
: product safety audit scenario
Alice,
An inspector cannot hold your shipment! They can however ask you to remove the
agency marking from the products prior to shipment.
Some examples of major deviations:
1) change of power supply
2) pcb traces that are different than original design
3) change
Hi Gary:
Your comment triggers another comment: Leadership.
Typically, we tend to let the inspector be the
leader for the duration of the inspection.
The host can be the leader.
The host can set the agenda (in advance, although
the inspector need not be notified). First, is to
decide
: FastWave [mailto:bi...@fastwave.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Sylvia Toma; Lay Siang Saw; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: product safety audit scenario
The Certification laboratories such as UL, CSA, ETL, MET, etc. cannot hold a
shipment. However, they can require
Agree, with it all, except I signed the VN - right after it was cleared
up
with the UL engineer. The inspector was correct that it didn't match the
descriptive file, it was also the case that it didn't matter from a hazard
perspective, and to avoid the problem in the future we did need
Hello Alice,
One scenario that an auditor can hold shipment is the system under audit
employs a different power supply (different manufacturer name and/or
model number) than the one stated in the Procedure or Critical Component
list of the Test Report. Power supply is a critical component
:16
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: product safety audit scenario
In the real world, however, such jugements are made by the safety agency
factory inspectors. Unfortunately, our factories have received several
variance notices in the past, but not a single one has resulted
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: product safety audit scenario
When the product differs from your product description - (most) auditors are
expressly forbidden to make engineering judgments - therefore is it says
Painted Steel in the narrative description and its actually Anodized
Aluminum then he will have
When the product differs from your product description - (most) auditors are
expressly forbidden to make engineering judgments - therefore is it says
Painted Steel in the narrative description and its actually Anodized
Aluminum then he will have no option but to stop shipment.
Best regards
Hi Alice:
Scenario : Component A with rating mentioned in the UL's product report as
90-135/180-265 Vac, however in the phyical unit is written as 115/230 V .
Q1 : Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ?
Yes, this is a non-conformity.
In this case, the report should be
Scenario : Component A with rating mentioned in the UL's product report
as
90-135/180-265 Vac, however in the phyical unit is written as 115/230 V .
Q1 : Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ?
Theoretically, it's a non-conformity, however if the component is being used
within its
Alice,
I have found that inspectors have allowed a manufacturer to claim more
stringent or limited ratings than what is in the UL report.
In some products that are rated at 120v from line-to-neutral, but are truly
3-phase products, it has been customary that you can denote the operating
voltage
12 matches
Mail list logo
