of the measurement
should not be an issue.
Rich
From: Brent DeWitt [mailto:bdew...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 2:44 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Measurement Uncertainty Above 18 GHz
I agree with Dennis. Any measurement of anything has
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: Larry K. Stillings [mailto:la...@complianceworldwide.com]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 2:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Measurement Uncertainty Above 18 GHz
Grace,
There are ETSI standards such as TS 103 051 that addresses MU up to 100 GHz a
Grace,
There are ETSI standards such as TS 103 051 that addresses MU up to 100 GHz and
TS 103 052 which addresses radiated measurement sites up to 100 GHz.
Larry K. Stillings
Compliance Worldwide, Inc.
Test Locally, Sell Globally and Launch Your Products Around the World!
FCC - Wireless
: Saturday, October 29, 2016 9:16 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Measurement Uncertainty Above 18 GHz
I don't see that one can tell if it's reasonable or not without a lot more
information, which is probably confidential to your c
9:16 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Measurement Uncertainty Above 18 GHz
I don't see that one can tell if it's reasonable or not without a lot more
information, which is probably confidential to your company.
But there isn't any major effect that occurs just above 18
I don't see that one can tell if it's reasonable or not without a lot more
information, which is probably confidential to your company.
But there isn't any major effect that occurs just above 18 GHz to make CISPR
16-4-2 no longer a good guide at least. Of course, you need an FAR that has no
6 matches
Mail list logo
