nto
one yet. I would challenge the interpretation that you received.
Regards,
Mike Rains
Foxboro Co.
>--
>From: jbie...@canberra.com[SMTP:jbie...@canberra.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 1997 7:58AM
>To:ri...@sdd.hp.com
>Cc:emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.o
esday, February 05, 1997 1:22PM
>To:jbie...@canberra.com
>Cc:'emc-p...@ieee.org'
>Subject: RE: Transformer Approvals
>
>John,
>
>My understanding of IEC1010 is that IEC742 only applies to transformers
>that are stand-alone (not built in). Transforme
>--
>From: Rains,Mike[SMTP:mra...@foxboro.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 1997 1:22PM
>To:jbie...@canberra.com
>Cc:'emc-p...@ieee.org'
>Subject: RE: Transformer Approvals
>
>John,
>
>My understanding of IEC1010 is that IEC74
ains
Foxboro Co.
>--
>From: jbie...@canberra.com[SMTP:jbie...@canberra.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 1997 7:58AM
>To:ri...@sdd.hp.com
>Cc:emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: Transformer Approvals
>
>Just wanted to thank you for your explanation. In this c
Just wanted to thank you for your explanation. In this case, the
transformers are built in to the instrument, behind a panel that
requires a 'tool' (key locked) to gain entry. I did have some
confusion about this, because as you indicated, IEC 1010 doesn't
specify a specific transformer standar
>--
>From: jbie...@canberra.com[SMTP:jbie...@canberra.com]
>Sent: Monday, February 03, 1997 4:46PM
>To:emc-p...@ieee.org
>Subject: Transformer Approvals
>
>At the end of last year, we shipped a piece of laboratory equipment to France
>that required C
.
Brian McAuliffe
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re: Transformer Approvals
Author: hans_mellb...@non-hp-santaclara-om4.om.hp.com at smtplink-tellabs
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:04/02/97 9:53
EN60704 is the
Hello from San Diego:
IEC 742 (aka EN 60742) applies to transformers in general and
stand-alone transformers in particular.
IEC 742 contains some additional requirements for stand-alone
transformers compared to those in IEC 950 (aka EN 60950).
Unfortunately, IEC 1010 (aka EN 61010) does not c
It turns out that I was given incorrect information. The certification that
they were referring to is EN 60742. Your reply prompted me to double check the
original information that I was given.
Subject: Transformer Approvals
From: MIME:HANS_MELLBERG @ non-hp-santaclara-om4.om.hp.com@INTERNET
Consultant
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Transformer Approvals
Author: Non-HP-owner-emc-pstc (owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org) at
HP-Boise,mimegw2
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:02/03/97 12:46 PM
At the end of last year, we shipped a piece of
At the end of last year, we shipped a piece of laboratory equipment to France
that required CE approval. We evaluated it for approval as laboratory equipment
in terms of complying with EN 61010-1. It was evaluated for EMC compliance. In
this piece of equipment, I used (2) transformers that poss
11 matches
Mail list logo
