The standard defines that as: Equipment for use in trade, professions,
or industries and which is not intended for sale to the general public.
The standard further defines that as: .high power equipment (
1kW) for professional use..
I'm crossing a few borders here but, you could
The only problem with CRIQ, is that you may end up with problem concerning
test results acceptance in the US.
If you are dealing with Power facility, or Telcos this may be an issue.
Jacques Cardinal
-Original Message-
From: Benoit Nadeau [SMTP:bnad...@matrox.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
b...@namg.us.anritsu.com writes:
Hi,
Ed Price said: I have heard of active cancellation equipment which can
generate a phase shifted image of the offending signal and locally
radiate
this signal so as to create a limited null zone. How big of a null
zone,
the uniformity of cancellation, the
I had to wrestle with the professional term in EN 55103-2 (audio, video,
and lighting controls for professional use). Basically, that standard
divides all equipment into consumer or professional types. So, if it is not
sold into the consumer market, it is considered to be professional
equipment.
Attached is a document that I received from SABS in South Africa. It
explains the mandatory EMC and Safety requirements that are now in effect
for most equipment.
Safrica.rtf
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
wo...@sensormatic.com
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent
Perhaps I should have been more explicit in my response to Tania. UL does
not require evaluation of Class 2 powered product, but _will now_ evaluate
Class 2 powered products, whereas they flat refused to in the past.
I hope this clarifies what I intended to say.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
Nortel
Muriel,
If an ambient (interfering) signal is strong enough, you will be unable to
make accurate readings of emissions on or near its frequency. Subtracting
the ambient's trace merely moves the place where it is displayed so that it
LOOKS like it's gone. It does not cancel out the received
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know if there is a difference between the Provision of Work
Equipment Regulations (PUWER 98) and 89/655/EEC. I have been told that
they are one in the same but it appears that they are not. If they are
not the same, does anyone know where I can obtain a
Hello Ed,
I suppose you have read The Minotaurefrom Stephen Coonts ! :)
Here active cancellation techniques are used to create the ultimate
stealth fighter ! Rather convincing for a non-emc guy.
Gert
== Ce-test, Qualified testing ==
Consultants in EMC, Electrical safety and Telecommunication
Dear EMC-PSTC Group,
I am trying to get some insight about what is really needed to sell into
Russia. I have heard several different approaches from distributors, sales
persons and marketing types concerning compliance to The State Committee for
Standardization, Metrology and Certification
Dear esteemed colleagues,
How would one perform conducted emissions testing manually using the front
panel keys on a HP 8568B and 85650A Spec. Analyzer and Adapter?Our lab
recently lost three days to down-time because of EMC software and hardware
problems encountered with one of our test
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to find out which regulations are applicable to a system which is
located in
cellular phone antenna sites. The system is used for charging the batteries
(48V, several
hundred amps), and monitoring generally the status in the site (e.g.
temperature, battery
12 matches
Mail list logo
