Richard,
To be clear, what problem and subject correctly are you referring to?
The IEC 61010-1 3rd Ed problem is specifying a test voltage of 0.9xclamping
voltage. From memory Edition 1 of IEC 62368-1 never specified a test voltage
of this level. Yes IEC 62368-1 had a twice AC mains
In message 018DCF4B527741149F102EFC42E21D42@RichardHPdv6, dated Fri,
11 May 2012, Richard Nute ri...@bendbroadband.com writes:
Would you like to check the latest draft of IEC 62368-1 to see if it
treats the subject correctly?
With respect to this problem, yes, IEC 62368-1 treats the
Hi Mick:
The problem is the one originally described.
The 2nd Edition of IEC 62368-1 is the result of
an ad hoc group that studied the various varistor
components to arrive at a set of requirements that
would allow the varistor (and its derivations) to
perform the intended clamping yet not
Hello John:
With respect to this problem, yes, IEC 62368-1 treats the subject
correctly.
So it could be used as evidence to persuade TC66 to reconsider.
Yes.
The 2nd Edition of IEC 62368-1 refers to IEC 61051.
TC66 should first identify the safety issue associated
with varistors (fire)
4 matches
Mail list logo