Maybe I'm missing something, and I'm certainly no statistician, but on
page 11, it states,
A manufacturer, knowing the typical standard deviation of RFI
measurements on his products, can – using the 80%/80% rule - estimate the
required margin to the limit already with a single prototype.
In message
OF632FC821.D7AF2A0F-ON88257DF2.00726988-88257DF2.007367B6@US.Schneider-E
lectric.com, dated Fri, 20 Feb 2015,
ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com writes:
A manufacturer, knowing the typical standard deviation of RFI
measurements on his products, can – using the 80%/80% rule -
Doug, Dave, Don, Rich:
Thanks for your input on this confusing topic. Based on your input, my
tentative conclusions can be summarized as follows:
1) The NEC requires an NRTL listing on all products that connect to the
public telecommunications network (including ordinary
Hi Joe:
I suppose that in theory, an AHJ could go into a Wal-Mart or other retail store
and tag consumer telephone products that lack an NRTL listing, but my
impression is that few AHJ’s are that zealous.
When I first came to Oregon (1960s), Oregon had two full-time inspectors
OSHA Conducted a Request for Information (RFI) back in 2008 that compared
the effectiveness and overall costs of SDoC vs 3rd Party Conformity
assessment, the full summary report can be found here
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=OSHA-2008-0032-0099 . While
there was no clean data
I'm drifting ever so slightly off topic now but . . .
legislation certainly keeps NRTLs in business. I've long admired the EU
model, where manufactures declare compliance and are responsible for it.
Do we really need 3rd party certification in USA, Canada, Australia, etc?
I think the new
6 matches
Mail list logo
