Re: [PSES] Harmonised standards

Hi Brian, Good explanation! We use the method #1 that to be interpreted correctly by most of readers. The symbol of forward slash means the only amendment may not be known by all. On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 03:49, Brian Kunde wrote: > This topic goes a little deeper, I think. Question being,

Re: [PSES] High Touch Current and GFCIs

Brian, Depending on the class of that circuit breaker, the answer is probably yes. See this article

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] High Touch Current and GFCIs

Hi Brian, Yes, it will trip. I have even worse news for you. It may trip if your touch current is less than 5 mA. We use the human body model for touch current measurement, and it's frequency limited. I had a product that was less than 1.5 mA touch current when measured with IEC 60990 methods,

Re: [PSES] High Touch Current and GFCIs

I have wondered about something similar. If I use a 6 way power strip, I’m assuming all the leakage currents for anything plugged in sum. Is that correct? I recall getting a few trips when I used a power strip and It’s only just twigged that might be why. Cheers, Derek. Sent from my iPad >

[PSES] High Touch Current and GFCIs

If I have a rake of electrical equipment with a single power cord and a combined touch current exceeding 6mA, and I plug the rake into a circuit with a GFCI, will it trip? Thanks. The Other Brian - This message is from the IEEE

Re: [PSES] Harmonised standards

Method  1 is sensible and not confusing. Method 2 is a product of the mentality of the Town Hall clerk, who, having received a certificate that a person was alive in September to December 1999, demanded a certificate that the person was alive in June to August 1999. I would not recommend

Re: [PSES] Harmonised standards

This topic goes a little deeper, I think. Question being, how are the harmonized standards to be listed on your DoC? It appears to me that the Commission lists standards a couple different ways, which adds to the confusion. For example, on the EMCD Harmonized Standards list, it shows it one way

Re: [PSES] Harmonised standards

Hi Gert, Thanks for your useful reply! The EN 55032 : 2017/A11 : 2020 contains the corrigendum only, no any technical changes. Does AC have another condition to qualify for? Will arrange some time for visiting the CENELEC site. Best regards, Scott On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 21:38, Gert Gremmen

Re: [PSES] Harmonised standards

Hi Scott, No only the : EN 55032 : 2017  is the Harmonised Standard (1 documnet) EN 55032 : 2017/A11 : 2020  is the (Harmonised) amendment only (1 dcoument) Both documents are needed. (did not check the OJ for you) EN 55032 : 2017+A11 : 2020  is both documents together. AC stands for

[PSES] Harmonised standards

Dear All, I notice the reference number of the standard OJ is listed in OJ as below:- EN 55032 : 2017, EN 55032 : 2017/A11 : 2020 Does it mean that the EN 55032 : 2017 with or without A11 : 2020 is acceptable as a harmonised standard? Is /A11 : 2020 identical with +A11 : 2020? EN