Hi Robert,
SPICE is a time domain tool, you might have difficulty finding a suitable
model as most antenna analysis is performed in the frequency domain. To find
the radiation resitance and impedance of a monopole is easy using one of the
NEC family of codes (Numerical Electromagnetics Code)
One approach to take for small apertures in solid sheets is to reverse
the model. That is model the equivalent dipole, you will have far fewer
elements and no meshing issues. Due to the duality between E and H
known as Babinet's priciple, this is vaild method.
Check out slide 8 on this link:
Hi,
Another way of thinking about this is to consider the effective aperture of
the slot antenna on the source side of the shield this will more easily give
the amount of energy coupled into the antenna. However, remember that the
shielding effectiveness equation is specific to planes wave
CEM = Computation ElectroMagnetics.
There are a number of us around using CEM for EMC design and anyalysis
where appropriate. The ACES group (Applied Computation Electromagnetics
Society) have a session dedicated to EMC at their annual conference in
Monterey, CA. (It's next week - if you hurry
Hi Charles,
I have seen some other replies but I understood your question differently. Are
you trying to test the receiver or is it simply a remote front end for your
measurement set? I don't know anything significant about the first, but if it
is the latter then the receive head should be
Hi Muriel,
You may need to use full 3D modeling to get evaluate stray L C and even
R but unless the object that you are examining is electrically large
(say .1 wavelength or more) you should not need a full wave tool for a
SMPS.
Lumped elements can be used even at very high frequencies
Hi Muriel,
I think the answers so far have given you some good ideas. There are
number of different things that can happen. Filter design should not be
considered as completely separate from the system design especially in a
power supply.
First, by providing a low impedance to the power
Greetings,
I believe David is correct here, the effect of the mismatch between
antenna and preamp is still there and so all the available energy from
the antenna will not be transferred to the preamp. However, the effects
of the length of cable will be gone as with zero length there can be no
Hi,
One metric that is missing is the cost of over-design. As we all know
EMC design is not quite a precise science :) but it is relatively easy
to make anything comply first time if cost, and size are ignored!
Depending upon the cost sensitivity of the product you might not want to
pass
Hi David,
You cannot ignore the ground plane at all. It would be better to think
of the transmit antenna as two separate antennas at 1m above and, 1m
below, the level of the ground plane and then you can ignore it to some
extent. You will always see the combination of these two sources.
Simply
Greetings Neven,
There are a couple of things that need to be considered when you have an
rf source close to a shield with apertures. First is the shielding
properties of the shield as people have said this is very dependent upon
the field impedance when you are in the near field. Second and
11 matches
Mail list logo