Subject: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Hello All,
Thanks to everyone who responded, especially for the sage advice.
Of the various facets of the Regulatory Compliance field, I find that
international approvals seem to be the most difficult.
Best Regards,
Brian Ceresney
Regulatory Lead
Delta-Q
which is usually accepted as being listed as “Various” by other countries.
From: Kevin Robinson [mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:17 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
All,
You may want to reach out to the National
In message
cy1pr0701mb188350deb98388a86224efe8e3...@cy1pr0701mb1883.namprd07.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Brian Ceresney
bceres...@delta-q.com writes:
When our CB report was issued, the engineer was not willing to add
wording to the Critical Components list to allow alternate
From: Brian Oconnell
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:39 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply To: Brian Oconnell
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
In both procedural controls and scoped test standards, North America
(NRTL/SCC/NOM) reports and the IECEE CB scheme are becoming more
: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Hello Brian,
Most CB Test Laboratories (CBTLs) will allow and accept the use of the term
interchangeable for some components. However, there are a few CBTLs that will
not accept this term and they require each and every alternate source to be
explicitly
ones they may try to give
you.
Best, Doug
Original Message
From: Brian Oconnell
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply To: Brian Oconnell
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Doug,
Thanks, will look for this stuff. The only stuff seen to date
Try this link
http://members.iecee.org/iecee/ieceemembers.nsf/ACRFList?readform
Doug.
Original Message
From: dougp01
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:50 PM
To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Brian,
Rules for component
Ceresney [mailto:bceres...@delta-q.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Greetings, Compliance Experts,
I'm finding myself in a curious situation, and wondering if you have had
similar experiences, and may have some advice
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Brian
I suggest you reference the IECEE website and read through the component
acceptance requirements for each target country, including the USA. I haven't
checked but there may also be such a document for the -2-29 you mention. These
can be found
Message-
From: dougp01 [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:53 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Brian
I suggest you reference the IECEE website and read through the component
acceptance requirements for each target country
[mailto:bceres...@delta-q.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CB Philosophy Questions
Greetings, Compliance Experts,
I'm finding myself in a curious situation, and wondering if you have had
similar experiences, and may have some advice to share
Greetings, Compliance Experts,
I'm finding myself in a curious situation, and wondering if you have had
similar experiences, and may have some advice to share.
We are in the process of using a CB report for an industrial battery charger(
to IEC60335-2-29) to obtain an in-country certification
12 matches
Mail list logo
