x and newer. We should not be
> considering the old EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2 because that is simply not
> sufficient for the RED.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Michael.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Charlie Blackham
>
> *Sent:* 17 September 2019 13:12
> *To:* EMC
301 489-1 V1.9.2 because that is
simply not sufficient for the RED.
Thanks,
Michael.
*From:*Charlie Blackham
*Sent:* 17 September 2019 13:12
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
Gert
EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2 was published in 2011 and is qui
org>
Sent: 16 September 2019 18:15
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
My answers for this are USA/FCC centric due to the nature of questions. ps.
Canada goes along too.
So a composite system would be mutually exclusive; when operatin
Blackham
Sent: 17 September 2019 13:12
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
Gert
EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2 was published in 2011 and is quite old now
As you know, EN 301 489-1 V2.1.1 was published by ETSI in February 2017 and
the latest
o: Charlie Blackham ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
Hi Charlie
That version of the standard 301-489-1 V2.2.1 has not yet been approved, yet
published, so be careful
For now keep relying on V1.9.2 , that does not mention your text on
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 11:34 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
That should be CISPR 35, not CISPR 24 now. In Europe, it would
be Class A. The manual should say 'This product is not to
Charlie Blackham
Sulis Consultants Ltd
Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317
Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
From: Gert Gremmen
Sent: 17 September 2019 09:01
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
Note
p 16, 2019 11:34 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
That should be CISPR 35, not CISPR 24 now. In Europe, it would be
Class A. The manual should say 'This product is not to be used in a
residential environment.'.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions O
n.uk>
To: peterhays <mailto:peterh...@aol.com>; EMC-PSTC
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 12:37 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
To give a reliable answer, we need to know the type of product or the
EMC emission standard th
comes to EU. Is that a
correct statement?
ThanksPeter
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
To: peterhays ; EMC-PSTC
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 11:34 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
That should be CISPR 35, not CISPR 24 now. In Europe, it would be Class A.
-
From: John Woodgate
To: peterhays ; EMC-PSTC
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 11:34 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
That should be CISPR 35, not CISPR 24 now. In Europe, it would be Class A. The
manual should say 'This product is not to be used in a reside
Ltd
Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317
Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
From: John Woodgate
Sent: 16 September 2019 19:35
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
That should be CISPR 35, not CISPR 24 no
9-16 17:56, peterh...@aol.com wrote:
The product is an ITE and follows CISPR 32 and CISPR 24
It will be sold globally
The product is a small touch panel.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
To: peterhays ; EMC-PSTC
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 12:37 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radi
My answers for this are USA/FCC centric due to the nature of questions. ps.
Canada goes along too.
So a composite system would be mutually exclusive; when operating as a Class A
unintentional radiator, the BT,
BlueTooth? the radio must not operate. Assuming a non-residential environment
for
The product is an ITE and follows CISPR 32 and CISPR 24
It will be sold globally
The product is a small touch panel.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
To: peterhays ; EMC-PSTC
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 12:37 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B
To give a
To give a reliable answer, we need to know the type of product or the
EMC emission standard that applies (e.g. CISPR 14-1/EN 55014-1) and
which countries/regions it will be sold in.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
O
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 02:51:17 +,
06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org wrote:
> I have a client that design and manufacture products for usein
> non-residential environment. This product consists of a BT module. I am
> toldthat the product must meet Class B emissions. Is this correct? Wha
Subpart C, Intentional radiators does not have a distinction for Class A/B.
Subpart B, Unintentional radiators has that distinction, allowing Class A for
non-residential environments.
Curiously, in subpart C, the general limits to be complied with are the same
levels specified in subpart B for
Dear Colleagues,
I have a client that design and manufacture products for usein non-residential
environment. This product consists of a BT module. I am toldthat the product
must meet Class B emissions. Is this correct? What if we putan statement in the
user manual stating that this product is
19 matches
Mail list logo
