FWIW, I was always deeply skeptical of the “(Pass, Fail, N/A)” criteria in the
TRF’s because those were, and generally still are, almost totally dependent on
“the eye of the beholder”, i.e. whoever does the compliance assessment!
We use the terms risk, risk assessment, hazard, and safety
” with my (and there were many L) managers L L.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 14 December 2018 21:26
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] TRF Verdicts
You appear to have uncovered a significantly unsatisfactory situation, where
You appear to have uncovered a significantly unsatisfactory situation,
where essential terminology is lacking formal definitions. TRFs are the
responsibility of a branch of IEC, called IECEE
(https://www.iecee.org/). I think that representations have to be made
to IECEE to remedy this
and working from my Android phone
> *From:* ri...@ieee.org
> *Sent:* December 13, 2018 12:19 PM
> *To:* doug...@gmail.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Reply-to:* ri...@ieee.org
> *Subject:* RE: [PSES] TRF Verdicts
>
>
>
> Hi Doug:
>
>
>
> Maybe one of these d
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGReply-to: ri...@ieee.orgSubject: RE: [PSES] TRF Verdicts Hi Doug: Maybe one of these documents will have the definitions you are looking for. https://www.iecee.org/documents/refdocs/ Best wishes for the holiday season,Rich From: Doug Powell <doug...@gmail.com>Sent: Wed
] TRF Verdicts
Greetings all, hope your week is going well,
I see differences in TRFs for both IEC and EN standards relating to the verdict
columns. IEC OD 2020 ed. 3.3 specifies allowed verdicts are Pass, Fail and N/A
(Not applicable). There is an exception for MED category allowing N/E
Greetings all, hope your week is going well,
I see differences in TRFs for both IEC and EN standards relating to the
verdict columns. IEC OD 2020 ed. 3.3 specifies allowed verdicts are *Pass,
Fail *and *N/A (Not applicable)*. There is an exception for MED category
allowing *N/E (Not
7 matches
Mail list logo