RE: PC EMI

2003-03-31 Thread drcuthbert
; randall.flind...@emulex.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: PC EMI Derek, While I have never seen the extent of failure (amplitude) you're talking about I have run into a tower or two that didn't comply. It was some few dB out hither and yon. (The monitor was the next biggest

RE: PC EMI

2003-03-27 Thread Gary McInturff
] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:59 PM To: randall.flind...@emulex.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: PC EMI In a message dated 3/25/2003 5:10:12 PM Central Standard Time, randall.flind...@emulex.com writes: I am sure you also addressed this but since I have 2 cents to add

RE: PC EMI

2003-03-27 Thread Flinders, Randall
...@emulex.com mailto:randall.flind...@emulex.com Web: http://www.emulex.com From: drcuthbert [mailto:drcuthb...@micron.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:31 PM To: 'lfresea...@aol.com'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' Subject: PC EMI Derrick, I'm sure you used the antenna factors correctly

PC EMI

2003-03-27 Thread drcuthbert
Derrick, I'm sure you used the antenna factors correctly but I'll put in my 2 cents worth anyway. Were the AF's used correctly? You need the TX AF and the RX AF. If the receive antenna factor was used as the transmit antenna factor that will skew the calibration. Dave Cuthbert This message

Re: PC EMI

2003-03-25 Thread lfresea...@aol.com
In a message dated 3/25/2003 5:10:12 PM Central Standard Time, randall.flind...@emulex.com writes: I am sure you also addressed this but since I have 2 cents to add... A front-end overload condition on the receiver/analyzer, or an overload at the pre-amplifier, can cause errors in

Re: PC EMI

2003-03-25 Thread lfresea...@aol.com
In a message dated 3/25/2003 4:31:09 PM Central Standard Time, drcuthb...@micron.com writes: Derrick, I'm sure you used the antenna factors correctly but I'll put in my 2 cents worth anyway. Were the AF's used correctly? You need the TX AF and the RX AF. If the receive antenna factor was used