; randall.flind...@emulex.com;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: PC EMI
Derek,
While I have never seen the extent of failure (amplitude) you're talking
about I have run into a tower or two that didn't comply. It was some few dB
out hither and yon. (The monitor was the next biggest
]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:59 PM
To: randall.flind...@emulex.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: PC EMI
In a message dated 3/25/2003 5:10:12 PM Central Standard Time,
randall.flind...@emulex.com writes:
I am sure you also addressed this but since I have 2 cents to add
...@emulex.com mailto:randall.flind...@emulex.com
Web: http://www.emulex.com
From: drcuthbert [mailto:drcuthb...@micron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:31 PM
To: 'lfresea...@aol.com'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: PC EMI
Derrick,
I'm sure you used the antenna factors correctly
Derrick,
I'm sure you used the antenna factors correctly but I'll put in my 2 cents
worth anyway. Were the AF's used correctly? You need the TX AF and the RX AF.
If the receive antenna factor was used as the transmit antenna factor that
will skew the calibration.
Dave Cuthbert
This message
In a message dated 3/25/2003 5:10:12 PM Central Standard Time,
randall.flind...@emulex.com writes:
I am sure you also addressed this but since I have 2 cents to add...
A front-end overload condition on the receiver/analyzer, or an overload at
the pre-amplifier, can cause errors in
In a message dated 3/25/2003 4:31:09 PM Central Standard Time,
drcuthb...@micron.com writes:
Derrick,
I'm sure you used the antenna factors correctly but I'll put in my 2 cents
worth anyway. Were the AF's used correctly? You need the TX AF and the RX AF.
If the receive antenna factor was used
6 matches
Mail list logo