' chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk,
- emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
-cc:(bcc: Douglas Beckwith/Kan/Mitel)
-
-Subject: RE: CE Marking - Prototypes
-
-
-
-
-
-PLEASE consider this in the context of what is expected in the
-US, from the
-UK.
-
-When I have exhibited the exhibition package
Hi Gregg:
My understanding if that:
where OSHA is applicable then UL or equivalent is mandatory.
True. However, replace UL or equivalent with NRTL.
where OSHA is not application then Local Code is mandatory - and LOCAL
Code
requires NRTL (UL or equivalent)
Not
--Original Message-
-From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
-[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
-douglas_beckw...@mitel.com
-Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:40 AM
-To: Gregg Kervill
-Cc: 'Chris Chileshe'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
-Subject: RE: CE Marking - Prototypes
)
Subject: RE: CE Marking - Prototypes
PLEASE consider this in the context of what is expected in the US, from the
UK.
When I have exhibited the exhibition package will specify something about
NOT connecting any equipment that is not UL Listed. Failure to adhere to
this clause usually promised
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Chileshe chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk
wrote (in 01c1a8aa.0a80bb80.chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk) about 'CE
Marking - Prototypes', on Tue, 29 Jan 2002:
I do not require much encouragement
to recall the unfortunate exhibitor with an exploding product.
And that
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:RE: CE Marking - Prototypes
PLEASE consider this in the context of what is expected in the US, from the
UK.
When I have exhibited the exhibition package will specify something about
NOT connecting any equipment that is not UL Listed. Failure to adhere to
this clause
Regarding products for demo's and exhibitions, Enci writes ..
Therefore the application of CE Marking or lack thereof is meaningless.
You would think so wouldn't you. A small problem arises in that if you have
competitors with a CE marked product, they will make it a point to display
this and
7 matches
Mail list logo
