RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-29 Thread Wagner, John P (John)
[SMTP:barry...@altavista.com] Reply To: Barry Ma Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 2:55 PM To: chr...@gnlp.com Cc: bkundew...@qtm.net; nprov...@foxboro.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics Chris, I am impressed by your gentleman discussion manner. We

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Barry Ma
Subject:RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics Hi Chris, Would you please prove that two product family standards 3-2 and 3-3 are only applicable to ITE? Thanks. Barry Ma b...@anritsu.com For the largest MP3 index

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Mike Hopkins
electronic products. Mike Hopkins mhopk...@keytek.com -Original Message- From: Barry Ma [SMTP:barry...@altavista.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 12:40 PM To: chr...@gnlp.com Cc: bkundew...@qtm.net; nprov...@foxboro.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Maxwell, Chris
-Original Message- From: Barry Ma [SMTP:barry...@altavista.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 12:40 PM To: chr...@gnlp.com Cc: bkundew...@qtm.net; nprov...@foxboro.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics Hi Chris, Would you please prove that two product family

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Gert Gremmen
- From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Provost,Norm Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 5:39 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Cc: Maxwell, Chris; 'Barry Ma'; bkundew...@qtm.net Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics Unfortunately I don't get to post to this list very often

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Barry Ma
Hi Chris, Would you please prove that two product family standards 3-2 and 3-3 are only applicable to ITE? Thanks. Barry Ma b...@anritsu.com -- On Tue, 28 March 2000, Maxwell, Chris wrote: . My understanding of the scope of EN 61000-3-2 and EN 61000-3-3 is that it is targeting

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Provost,Norm
Provost -Original Message- From: Maxwell, Chris [SMTP:chr...@gnlp.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 8:48 AM To: 'Barry Ma'; bkundew...@qtm.net; nprov...@foxboro.com Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics I'd like to present a dissenting opinion on this one

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-28 Thread Maxwell, Chris
...@ieee.org Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics Hi Brian, Here is my $0.02. (1) As far as EN61326-1 is concerned, Class A is not required to pass EN61000-3-2 and EN61000-3-3. Because EN61326 committee treated these two standards as basic standards. (2) However, they are not basic standards

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-27 Thread eric . lifsey
barry...@altavista.com To: bkundew...@qtm.net, nprov...@foxboro.com cc: emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Eric Lifsey/AUS/NIC) Subject: RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics Hi Brian, Here is my $0.02. (1) As far as EN61326-1 is concerned, Class A is not required to pass EN61000-3-2 and EN61000-3-3. Because

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-27 Thread Barry Ma
Hi Brian, Here is my $0.02. (1) As far as EN61326-1 is concerned, Class A is not required to pass EN61000-3-2 and EN61000-3-3. Because EN61326 committee treated these two standards as basic standards. (2) However, they are not basic standards. They are product standards. If your product falls

RE: EN61326-1 Harmonics

2000-03-24 Thread Provost,Norm
The exclusion of harmonic test requirements in EN 61326 for equipment which need only meet Class A emission limits was a deliberate decision by the authors. It was not an omission by error. Many outside the committee now view this decision as a mistake. There is no revision in progress.