I read in !emc-pstc that cherryclo...@aol.com wrote (in
3f.61cee6f.29928...@aol.com) about 'SV: Generic emissions - EN
61000-6-3', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002:
My intention was simply to remind people (if any reminding was needed)
that
achieving a presumption of conformity does not necessarily
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
writes:
Subj:Re: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
Date:05/02/02 22:57:37 GMT Standard Time
From:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk (John Woodgate)
Sender:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Reply-to: A HREF=mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk;j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk/A
(John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that cherryclo...@aol.com wrote (in 17b.31edfe2.299
12...@aol.com) about 'SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Tue, 5
Feb 2002:
Where the electromagnetic environment or proximity to sensitive devices
(such as radio receivers) for the intended use of a product
Armstrong
www.cherryclough.com
In a message dated 01/02/02 21:16:44 GMT Standard Time,
jim.eich...@xantrex.com writes:
Subj:RE: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
Date:01/02/02 21:16:44 GMT Standard Time
From:jim.eich...@xantrex.com (Jim Eichner)
Sender:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB601767784@BCMAIL1) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Fri, 1 Feb 2002:
The New Approach guideline seems pretty clear: a standard is NOT considered
to provide a presumption
AM
To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
John
We will have to agree to disagree on the semantic issues
BUT I will not accept your putting words in my mouth on interpretations of
the current and draft EMC Directives.
For the record, I
I read in !emc-pstc that Brian Jones e...@brianjones.co.uk wrote (in
002001c1ab0b$47b63d00$9141c0c1@oemcomputer) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Fri, 1 Feb 2002:
John
We will have to agree to disagree on the semantic issues
Let us hope that that does not give rise to any
John
We will have to agree to disagree on the semantic issues
BUT I will not accept your putting words in my mouth on interpretations of
the current and draft EMC Directives.
For the record, I deliberately used the word apply which is the wording of
the current Directive. Apply does not
I read in !emc-pstc that Brian Jones e...@brianjones.co.uk wrote (in
008a01c1aa69$1c259e80$8441c0c1@oemcomputer) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Thu, 31 Jan 2002:
John and everyone
I do not wish to get into a semantics argument as to whether the Commission
has chosen the most
Brian Jones
EMC Consultant and Competent Body Signatory
- Original Message -
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
snip
No, that is 'notified', not 'harmonized
Compliance with Directives
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/legislation/guide/document/
chap04.pdf
It's only 4 pages.
Enci
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB601767759@BCMAIL1) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Wed, 30 Jan 2002:
If you are using the standards route to compliance, what determines which
standards you MUST use? Are we
: (604) 420-1591
e-mail: jim.eich...@xantrex.com
web: www.xantrex.com
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:49 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
As long
Subject: Re: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A01F13D09@flbocexu05) about 'SV: Generic emissions -
EN 61000-6-3', on Tue, 29 Jan 2002:
As long as we are getting picky, let's don't forget that the Directives
: jim.eich...@xantrex.com
web: www.xantrex.com
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:49 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
As long as we are getting picky
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A01F13D09@flbocexu05) about 'SV: Generic emissions -
EN 61000-6-3', on Tue, 29 Jan 2002:
As long as we are getting picky, let's don't forget that the Directives
don't have a harmonized definition of what
: jim.eich...@xantrex.com
web: www.xantrex.com
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:49 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3
As long as we are getting picky, let's
I read in !emc-pstc that Brian Jones e...@brianjones.co.uk wrote (in
009001c1a8d0$c4fc0840$d841c0c1@oemcomputer) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Tue, 29 Jan 2002:
It is not true that all ENs are harmonised. The term, in this context,
means specifically ENs which have been
-6-3
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB
mhpeibnilaehgccaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Tue, 29 Jan 2002:
AFAIK EN61000-6-3 is not harmonized yet.
ALL ENs are AUTOMATICALLY harmonized. I expect you mean
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB
mhpeibnilaehgccaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Tue, 29 Jan 2002:
AFAIK EN61000-6-3 is not harmonized yet.
ALL ENs are AUTOMATICALLY harmonized. I expect you mean that it may
AFAIK EN61000-6-3 is not harmonized yet. I have a problem to access the
CENELEC web in order to check the current status of this standards.
I have a copy of CISPR/CEI-IEC 1000-6-3:1996, but I don't know if this issue
is the latest version because the IEC site is also down for the moment. In
this
21 matches
Mail list logo
