Re: UL P.A.G.

lobbjbnlajjdfilpcaancehncjaa.peperkin...@cs.com, Pete Perkins peperkin...@cs.com inimitably wrote: Some standards committees themselves work to clarify the requirements; for instance TC74/IEC 60950 has a chairman's advisory panel that will answer questions from IEC national committees (not from

RE: UL P.A.G.

email f...@netc.ie -Original Message- From: Pete Perkins [mailto:peperkin...@cs.com] Sent: 21 May 2001 16:12 To: PSNet; Brian O'Connell Subject: RE: UL P.A.G. PSNet UL Practical application guide discussion Several good points have been made in the discussion of the practical

RE: UL P.A.G.

PSNet UL Practical application guide discussion Several good points have been made in the discussion of the practical application guide supplied by UL; I’ll add my U$ two-bits worth here Let's start with a story: the question of interpretation has been with us for a long time. An old timer,

RE: UL P.A.G.

...@dell.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:43 AM To: masse...@ems-t.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: UL P.A.G. I guess that one thing to keep in mind is that the PAG is exactly that...a guideline based on interpretation, it is not the standard. My opinion and not that of my employer

RE: UL P.A.G.

, 2001 8:52 AM To: 'IEEE Forum' Subject: RE: UL P.A.G. I really didn't feel that I should pay for a subscription to the PAG's to clarify points in the standard, until a situation arose where the UL engineer on my project referred to a PAG note, and of course, I had to buy a subscription to verify

RE: UL P.A.G.

...@ieee.org Subject: UL P.A.G. I would welcome opinions on the usefulness of a subscription to the UL Practical Application Guidelines. I speak only for myself. thnx mucho Brian --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical

RE: UL P.A.G.

, but I think the PAG's could be better. -Original Message- From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 3:17 PM To: 'Brian O'Connell '; 'emc-p...@ieee.org ' Subject: RE: UL P.A.G. Hello Brian, My personal opinion is that PAGs (Practical Application

RE: UL P.A.G.

To: emc-p...@ieee.org Sent: 5/17/01 3:49 PM Subject: UL P.A.G. I would welcome opinions on the usefulness of a subscription to the UL Practical Application Guidelines. I speak only for myself. thnx mucho Brian --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society

UL P.A.G.

I would welcome opinions on the usefulness of a subscription to the UL Practical Application Guidelines. I speak only for myself. thnx mucho Brian --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion