]On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 11:34 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: IEC 62368-1
In message 006501cc7561$a90c60e0$fb2522a0$@com, dated Sat, 17 Sep
2011, Charlie Blackham emcp...@sulisconsultants.com writes:
Has anyone had a product tested to IEC 62368-1
In message 006501cc7561$a90c60e0$fb2522a0$@com, dated Sat, 17 Sep
2011, Charlie Blackham emcp...@sulisconsultants.com writes:
Has anyone had a product tested to IEC 62368-1 or know of a lab who has
tested against it?
I've no doubt that the team that wrote it have tried. I believe the
product
In message p06240801c79b7539d046@[192.168.0.45], dated Fri, 12 Feb
2010, Nick Williams nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk writes:
Do you know if BS will publish the standard (presumably as a BS IEC if
there is to be no EN version at this stage)?
I know of no plans to do so. I think it is very
John,
Do you know if BS will publish the standard (presumably as a BS IEC
if there is to be no EN version at this stage)?
If they are not going to publish it then I will buy a copy from IEC
but if they are then I will wait until it appears in the BS Online
service.
Nick.
At 19:21 +
In message 9360F1D2B3C045618D6F94F546142B75@OwnerPC, dated Thu, 11 Feb
2010, Ron Pickard, RPQ rpick...@rpqconsulting.com writes:
The IEC has just announced the publication (21-Jan-2010) of the safety
standard IEC 62368-1:2010 ed1.0 (now encompassing audio/video,
information and communication
PSNet'ers,
M Loerzner is correct IEC/TC 108 has approved 108/325/FDIS as IEC
62368-1. This is the long awaited Hazard Based Safety Standard, a
significant change in the approach to developing the safety requirements.
It will be a replacement for both IEC 60950 and IEC 60065 after the
In message
28aa7ba6b8bc04409c3272690562b639016b6...@ausx3mps308.aus.amer.dell.com,
dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009, kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com writes:
From the voting results on the second CDV, I?d surmise there is a
significant amount of controversy and expect the new standard will be
interesting
Ron
According to the IEC website, it is approved for FDIS circulation, which
happened on 23rd January. The target date is 31st March.
I am not close enough to elaborate on this, but I'd guess that a published
standard is some way off yet.
Neil Barker
Manager
Central Quality
e2v
106
From the voting results on the second CDV, I’d surmise there is a
significant amount of controversy and expect the new standard will be
interesting in it’s interpretations and implementation ….especially if
there are early adopters.
Regards,
kaz
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 000e01c8eb7d$615b4570$7200a8c0@PC323541548743, dated Mon,
21 Jul 2008, 'Rich Nute' rn...@san.rr.com writes:
Once you understand the concepts, the new standard is not radical.
I think the situation is far more complex than can be embraced in a
simple statement. There is a question
In message 000f01c8eb75$d8adf800$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Mon,
21 Jul 2008, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes:
1. What is the status of IEC62368 and the associated and infamous
IEC62441 ?
Highly controversial. There are strong pressures on national committees
to approve
Hi Brian:
1. What is the status of IEC62368 and the associated and
infamous IEC62441 ? Ultimately, when are 60950-1 and 60065
projected to be replaced by 62368 ?
CDV2 will be issued to National Committees for voting
this or next month. (You can get a copy from your National
TC and their CENELEC reps. Sorta hoping to toss
two stones at three birds.
luck,
Brian
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of 'Rich
Nute'
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 3:02 PM
To: 'Brian O'Connell'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: IEC 62368
Hi Brian:
1. What is the status
13 matches
Mail list logo
