Can anything be done by improving halscope? Maybe save a list of 16(?)
significant hal items (time, in-cycle yes/no?, encoder positions,
following errors, velocities, etc., whatever might be helpful) and
save them to disk so that you at least have a bunch of logged data to
review after trouble
On 15 April 2011 23:19, Colin K wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2011, at 2:08 PM, andy pugh wrote:
>>
>> If you _only_ have index then you have to be very sure that the spindle
>> speed won't vary during a cut.
>
> Does EMC compensate for spindle speed at all in this case, or is the second
> encoder requir
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> nothing is figured out yet
>
Ugh! Debugging something that only happens every couple days can be
real hard. If it only happens once a month or less, it can be
maddening, as you have no idea whether you really have it fixed until
YEARS have gone by!
Jon
--
On Apr 15, 2011, at 2:08 PM, andy pugh wrote:
>
> If you _only_ have index then you have to be very sure that the spindle speed
> won't vary during a cut.
Does EMC compensate for spindle speed at all in this case, or is the second
encoder required for that? I don't generally expect any more fr
On 15 April 2011 22:09, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
> I have wound single layer coils before, but I was wondering if it is
> possible to do multiple layers using G76 = canned threading cycle?
I would have thought that G1 moves in feed-per-rev would work best in
this application.
--
atp
"Torque wren
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/gcode_main.html#sec:G33,-G33.1:-Spindle-Synchronized
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Frank Tkalcevic <
fr...@franksworkshop.com.au> wrote:
> I need to wind a coil for an RFID reader - about 90 turns, 5mm wide, 8
> layers.
>
> I have wound single layer coils before,
I need to wind a coil for an RFID reader - about 90 turns, 5mm wide, 8
layers.
I have wound single layer coils before, but I was wondering if it is
possible to do multiple layers using G76 = canned threading cycle? Can I
use multiple G76 commands to lay the coil forward, then backward? Will the
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 12:03 -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
> > Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > > Gentlemen,
> > > Another point of interest FYI.
> > > The operator reported putting .392 in the g54 offset has eliminated the
> > > miss position
On 15 April 2011 18:44, Colin K wrote:
> Right now I have my spindle index wired in and if I use the hal config
> screens in axis I can see the state of the pin flip as I turn the spindle.
> However I get the sense I may need to do a bit more config to get it all to
> work.
If you _only_ have
There is an example in the Integrators Manual.
John
Colin K wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently set up my mini lathe with the EMC stepconf and the basic functions
> are great. However I do not have any tach display in Axis and if I try to run
> a g76 cycle everything in Axis looks right but when I
Hi all,
I recently set up my mini lathe with the EMC stepconf and the basic functions
are great. However I do not have any tach display in Axis and if I try to run a
g76 cycle everything in Axis looks right but when I hit go, it just stares back
at me and does nothing.
Right now I have my spi
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > Gentlemen,
> > Another point of interest FYI.
> > The operator reported putting .392 in the g54 offset has eliminated the
> > miss position occurrences. Apparently, the g55 position was not miss
> > positioning a
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:28:00AM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
> > Gentlemen,
> > Another point of interest FYI.
> > The operator reported putting .392 in the g54 offset has eliminated the
> > miss position occurrences. Apparently, t
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Another point of interest FYI.
> The operator reported putting .392 in the g54 offset has eliminated the
> miss position occurrences. Apparently, the g55 position was not miss
> positioning at all, ever.
>
Are you saying this was ALL operator error? (D
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:28:00AM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Another point of interest FYI.
> The operator reported putting .392 in the g54 offset has eliminated the
> miss position occurrences. Apparently, the g55 position was not miss
> positioning at all, ever.
I do not
Gentlemen,
Another point of interest FYI.
The operator reported putting .392 in the g54 offset has eliminated the
miss position occurrences. Apparently, the g55 position was not miss
positioning at all, ever.
thanks
Stuart
--
dos centavos
--
On 15 April 2011 05:27, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> Maybe a PUMA model could be made with RC servo's.
I am wondering about a tiny little DELTA robot.
(Google)
Looks like it has already been done...
http://www.jarkman.co.uk/catalog/robots/sketchy.htm
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of f
17 matches
Mail list logo
