John,
Thanks for the report, I have fixed that in 1.6.04
JT
On 2/20/2014 8:06 PM, John Alexander Stewart wrote:
John;
I do everything in metric; the Preferences-Preamble, when I change G20 to
G21, and save, it does not seem to have saved next time I run the program.
Still trying to run
So it seems that the hal configuration has to be altered and the
ini,just reading the sample pico configs.
All i need now is someone to integrate this into the beaglebone/xylotex
db25 configs.
How is the deadband figure worked out,Trial and error?
On 21/02/14 05:47, Jon Elson wrote:
On
Where did you try and put mm? Change the preamble line to G21 ... for
metric G code.
I did fix a few things and 1.6.05 is the latest version.
JT
On 2/20/2014 3:02 PM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
John
Does the metric units work. I tried with mm and MM but I get an error
that says mill instance
I changed the units entry in the INI file.
On 2014-02-21 15:15, John Thornton wrote:
Where did you try and put mm? Change the preamble line to G21 ... for
metric G code.
I did fix a few things and 1.6.05 is the latest version.
JT
On 2/20/2014 3:02 PM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
John
Does
Ah you don't change the ini file directly when you save the preferences
it updates the ini file.
JT
On 2/21/2014 7:31 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
I changed the units entry in the INI file.
On 2014-02-21 15:15, John Thornton wrote:
Where did you try and put mm? Change the preamble line to
You see I am getting used to Linux. Always expect the difficult.
On 2014-02-21 15:45, John Thornton wrote:
Ah you don't change the ini file directly when you save the preferences
it updates the ini file.
JT
On 2/21/2014 7:31 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
I changed the units entry in the INI
On 02/20/2014 11:47 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
On 02/20/2014 12:01 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Peter's solution will work. I was going to add a dead-band to the PID
control internal to the HAL component that talks to the PRU, but Peter's
suggestion of pushing the PID outside the PRU driver and
On 02/21/2014 05:41 AM, Mark Tucker wrote:
So it seems that the hal configuration has to be altered and the
ini,just reading the sample pico configs.
All i need now is someone to integrate this into the beaglebone/xylotex
db25 configs.
How is the deadband figure worked out,Trial and error?
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 21:26 +, Steve Blackmore wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:59:08 -0500, you wrote:
Hi all; may be off topic, but am wondering about converting my Centec 2B
mill to CNC. X,Y axes are relatively easy; Z is difficult.
Is there any real need to convert the Z axis,
On 2/21/2014 12:01 PM, dave wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 21:26 +, Steve Blackmore wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:59:08 -0500, you wrote:
Hi all; may be off topic, but am wondering about converting my Centec 2B
mill to CNC. X,Y axes are relatively easy; Z is difficult.
Is there any real
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 20:16 -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
On 02/19/2014 04:41 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Jon,
Do you have a people limit?
No, not really, as long as the weather is good. There are
some tricky
details. The road down to the cabin is quite rough, we do
it in a
Honda
Let me know if you find anything else.
JT
On 2/21/2014 7:58 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
You see I am getting used to Linux. Always expect the difficult.
On 2014-02-21 15:45, John Thornton wrote:
Ah you don't change the ini file directly when you save the preferences
it updates the ini file.
On 19 Feb 2014, at 22:40, John Alexander Stewart ivatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm. The Centec is in the basement, and I do like it, and my wife likes
the retro feel. Hmmm
Old iron beats new iron a lot of the time.
My Harrison conversion uses custom iron castings for the motor mounts
Mark
What type of motors and voltage are you using, is the crackling random,
or specifically after a certain type of move??
Regards
Peter Smith
On 21/02/14 16:55, Jon Elson wrote:
On 02/21/2014 05:41 AM, Mark Tucker wrote:
So it seems that the hal configuration has to be altered and the
Mark
What type of motors and voltage are you using, is the crackling random,
or specifically after a certain type of move??
Regards
Peter Smith
On 21/02/14 16:55, Jon Elson wrote:
On 02/21/2014 05:41 AM, Mark Tucker wrote:
So it seems that the hal configuration has to be altered and the
Hi All,
A new version 1.5.0 of gcmc has been released.
There have been quite a few changes on the syntax and semantic level, as
well as additional built-in functions for various things.
An important semantic change is how add/subtract (+ and -) handles undef
values. A second set of operators +|
The link worked just fine, Andy! Thank you - John.
Old iron beats new iron a lot of the time.
My Harrison conversion uses custom iron castings for the motor mounts etc.
I went down the path of how would Harrison have made a CNC mill.
This link might work. (Hard to do on the phone)
Yeah - I did some digging and that whole L word in a fixed cycle dates back
to the original NIST RS-274D-NGC.
IMHO - Its a dinosaur that should have died out. I consider it an accident
waiting to be activated by the user.
One of the most powerful reasons to switch to LCNC is the faster
18 matches
Mail list logo
