On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Marius Alksnys marius.alks...@gmail.com
wrote:
I strongly disagree with you from two points of view:
1. freedom - the component is great and it would be even greater with a
bit more freedom.
2. In my opinion, control has to be fast and simple. And user /
Mark, et al:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Mark Wendt wendt.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Buttons? We don't need no steenkin' buttons!
Increment, decrement, all on one knob. ;-)
http://www.automationtechnologiesinc.com/products-page/mpgs/mpg2-pendant
I have one of these connected to one of
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:47 AM, John Alexander Stewart ivatt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mark, et al:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Mark Wendt wendt.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Buttons? We don't need no steenkin' buttons!
Increment, decrement, all on one knob. ;-)
I will use this driver as a starting point since I did not work with linuxcnc
before and later on I will probably switch to a standard protocol. I have
worked with CANopen and guess the aproach used for PDO communication but sent
via UDP would be good but some drawbacks could be accepted if it
