On 11/12/2015 05:47 PM, Jeremy Jones wrote:
> Thinking about picking up a Conquest 42. The machine is supposedly in good
> shape but the Fanuc OT control might be shot and the motherboard would need
> to replaced. Will try to resurrect but I'm thinking linuxcnc anyway since I
> did a Bridgport rece
Thinking about picking up a Conquest 42. The machine is supposedly in good
shape but the Fanuc OT control might be shot and the motherboard would need
to replaced. Will try to resurrect but I'm thinking linuxcnc anyway since I
did a Bridgport recently.
I've seen a lot of CHNC conversions but could
On Thursday 12 November 2015 17:07:01 andy pugh wrote:
> On 12 November 2015 at 21:44, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Checking the status in showconfig, it (gpio.003) is an input. And
> >> I do not believe I have a separate pullup on the line, that card is
> >> AFAIK, doing that 3.3 volts. Any pullup
On Thursday 12 November 2015 16:51:26 Michał Geszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 12.11.2015 o 22:44, Gene Heskett pisze:
> > On Thursday 12 November 2015 12:02:27 Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Greetings, I hope Peter is about;
> >>
> >> I have smashed up the brass plate I use for tool length sensing,
> >> twic
On 12 November 2015 at 21:44, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Checking the status in showconfig, it (gpio.003) is an input. And I
>> do not believe I have a separate pullup on the line, that card is
>> AFAIK, doing that 3.3 volts. Any pullups I would have installed would
>> have been to the 5 volt rail.
W dniu 12.11.2015 o 22:44, Gene Heskett pisze:
> On Thursday 12 November 2015 12:02:27 Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> Greetings, I hope Peter is about;
>>
>> I have smashed up the brass plate I use for tool length sensing, twice
>> today, because the 5i25.0.gpio.003_in is not seeing a probe contact.
>>
On Thursday 12 November 2015 12:02:27 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings, I hope Peter is about;
>
> I have smashed up the brass plate I use for tool length sensing, twice
> today, because the 5i25.0.gpio.003_in is not seeing a probe contact.
>
> Worse yet, it seems to be intermittent, working well a
It just means that for specific moves that involve ABC axes, the planner
will fall back to parabolic blends (i.e. 2.6-style blending). This means
that continuous contouring using the A axis will be slower than the
equivalent 3-axis path, if the program has a lot of short segments. In your
case, the
Greetings, I hope Peter is about;
I have smashed up the brass plate I use for tool length sensing, twice
today, because the 5i25.0.gpio.003_in is not seeing a probe contact.
Worse yet, it seems to be intermittent, working well after the first such
incident. Changed tools, and went to calibrate
2015-11-11 14:51 GMT+02:00 Robert Ellenberg :
> Currently the TP does not support arc blends between rotary axis moves
Rob, are you saying that this code would not be supported?
G01X1.279Z14.031
X1.544Z13.921
X1.720Z13.834
X1.897Z13.735
X2.073Z13.622
X2.250Z13.496
X2.426Z13.352
X2.470Z13.313
X2.4
10 matches
Mail list logo
