Re: [Emc-users] RPI saga continues - SPI probably solved

2017-06-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 01 June 2017 19:46:29 Bertho Stultiens wrote: > On 06/01/2017 02:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Hi Bertho; I haven't heard any more, so I am wondering if you've > > found any more "magic beans"? > > Yes, I think I've tracked down (most of) the problem(s). There are > several factors

Re: [Emc-users] RPI saga continues - SPI probably solved

2017-06-01 Thread Bertho Stultiens
On 06/01/2017 02:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Hi Bertho; I haven't heard any more, so I am wondering if you've found > any more "magic beans"? Yes, I think I've tracked down (most of) the problem(s). There are several factors that play a role. Not all are solved or maybe solvable, but the timing

Re: [Emc-users] Semi OT: Chinese servo motors Yifeng branded

2017-06-01 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
Thank you guys. I asked to the seller for manuals or any kind of documentation to start. Then may be I give it a try and purchase a little one to test it out and see how it works. I'll let you know whatever happens. 2017-06-01 4:50 GMT-03:00 theman whosoldtheworld : >

Re: [Emc-users] Simulations In Master?

2017-06-01 Thread Todd Zuercher
Perhaps a spoke too soon about it all working. Linuxcnc started with my config using the new sim_parport but I'm running into a few bugs. I don't know if the problem is my config, or a bug in Master. The config is a 4 axis XYZW config, with only XYZW and joints 0,1,2,3 defined. (I really like

Re: [Emc-users] Simulations In Master?

2017-06-01 Thread Todd Zuercher
I'm not sure that there are any. I'll have to check what does and doesn't show. I do know that the normal example configs with 1 port run fine in the VM (VirtualBox). - Original Message - From: "Sebastian Kuzminsky" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"

Re: [Emc-users] Simulations In Master?

2017-06-01 Thread Todd Zuercher
Thanks Andy, I made a new component (sim_parport2) and that seemed to work. Perhaps someone should put a revised version of sim_parport in the main release. - Original Message - From: "andy pugh" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"

Re: [Emc-users] Simulations In Master?

2017-06-01 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 06/01/2017 01:22 PM, Todd Zuercher wrote: I was trying to convert one of my machine configs to test with Master. Testing in a VM. I've ran into a couple of snags though. The machine uses 3 parallel ports, two of them in X-mode, and one as Out. When I try to run the

Re: [Emc-users] Simulations In Master?

2017-06-01 Thread andy pugh
On 1 June 2017 at 20:22, Todd Zuercher wrote: > Any suggestions? It's a very simple comp. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/src/hal/components/sim_parport.comp So adding the extra pins needed should be trivial. (I can't help feeling

[Emc-users] Simulations In Master?

2017-06-01 Thread Todd Zuercher
I was trying to convert one of my machine configs to test with Master. Testing in a VM. I've ran into a couple of snags though. The machine uses 3 parallel ports, two of them in X-mode, and one as Out. When I try to run the config I get: Error: could not insert module

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 openProfibus

2017-06-01 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
Right now I design away from Ethernet within machine because with my computer and switches and it does not work perfect. Whatever the reason is I simply can't do anything about it. On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:32:27 -0700 Chris Albertson wrote: > Modern Ethernet does not

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 openProfibus

2017-06-01 Thread Chris Albertson
Modern Ethernet does not have a collision problem. It uses a switched topology. All of the cables are point to point. One end is on your device the other is on a switch. The switch has enough performance and bandwidth to drive all cables at full wire speed. The switch adds very little

Re: [Emc-users] RPI saga continues - SPI probably solved

2017-06-01 Thread Bertho Stultiens
On 06/01/2017 02:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Hi Bertho; I haven't heard any more, so I am wondering if you've found > any more "magic beans"? Still looking into options. There is that persy dayjob taking away attention from the real work ;-) Seriously, it is exams-period and that requires some

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 openProfibus --> openPowerlink

2017-06-01 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
Yes openPowerlink might be a really good choice. I implemented CANopen over UDP for configuration a few weeks ago and openPowerlink is adapted from CANopen. The SDO communication from CANopen work really well for configuration and I guess it should also work well for between machine

Re: [Emc-users] Semi OT: Chinese servo motors Yifeng branded

2017-06-01 Thread theman whosoldtheworld
something i buy servo from china ... there are 3 possibility: 1) the seller send all kit Delta brand (motor+drive+cable) 2) the seller send Delta Drive but china motor 3) the seller may be is a guy that buy by Hong Kong import office, whitout tax, and sell the goods on ebay. In my experience

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 openProfibus

2017-06-01 Thread theman whosoldtheworld
nothing missed ... only not know the STMBL project it seems quite simple obtain a calculated angle of joint for send the data to my program for 18 point delta calibration, so I find these project real interesting. Apart from that, I'm investigating the possibility of having open industrial

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 openProfibus

2017-06-01 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
> If Ethernet is "complex" then PowerLink is "very complex" as it is a few > layers over top of Ethernet. > > Is there a list of requirements some place? What are the end points, > processes that run on a CPU of some kind. > > I've been doing this kind of work for ages but you can't select

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 openProfibus

2017-06-01 Thread Chris Albertson
If Ethernet is "complex" then PowerLink is "very complex" as it is a few layers over top of Ethernet. Is there a list of requirements some place? What are the end points, processes that run on a CPU of some kind. I've been doing this kind of work for ages but you can't select anything without