On Thursday 01 June 2017 19:46:29 Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> On 06/01/2017 02:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Hi Bertho; I haven't heard any more, so I am wondering if you've
> > found any more "magic beans"?
>
> Yes, I think I've tracked down (most of) the problem(s). There are
> several factors
On 06/01/2017 02:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Hi Bertho; I haven't heard any more, so I am wondering if you've found
> any more "magic beans"?
Yes, I think I've tracked down (most of) the problem(s). There are
several factors that play a role. Not all are solved or maybe solvable,
but the timing
Thank you guys.
I asked to the seller for manuals or any kind of documentation to start.
Then may be I give it a try and purchase a little one to test it out and
see how it works.
I'll let you know whatever happens.
2017-06-01 4:50 GMT-03:00 theman whosoldtheworld :
>
Perhaps a spoke too soon about it all working.
Linuxcnc started with my config using the new sim_parport but I'm running into
a few bugs.
I don't know if the problem is my config, or a bug in Master.
The config is a 4 axis XYZW config, with only XYZW and joints 0,1,2,3 defined.
(I really like
I'm not sure that there are any. I'll have to check what does and doesn't
show. I do know that the normal example configs with 1 port run fine in the VM
(VirtualBox).
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Kuzminsky"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Thanks Andy, I made a new component (sim_parport2) and that seemed to work.
Perhaps someone should put a revised version of sim_parport in the main release.
- Original Message -
From: "andy pugh"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
On 06/01/2017 01:22 PM, Todd Zuercher wrote:
I was trying to convert one of my machine configs to test with Master. Testing
in a VM.
I've ran into a couple of snags though. The machine uses 3 parallel ports, two
of them in X-mode, and one as Out.
When I try to run the
On 1 June 2017 at 20:22, Todd Zuercher
wrote:
> Any suggestions?
It's a very simple comp.
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/src/hal/components/sim_parport.comp
So adding the extra pins needed should be trivial.
(I can't help feeling
I was trying to convert one of my machine configs to test with Master. Testing
in a VM.
I've ran into a couple of snags though. The machine uses 3 parallel ports, two
of them in X-mode, and one as Out.
When I try to run the config I get:
Error: could not insert module
Right now I design away from Ethernet within machine because with my computer
and switches and it does not work perfect. Whatever the reason is I simply
can't do anything about it.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:32:27 -0700
Chris Albertson wrote:
> Modern Ethernet does not
Modern Ethernet does not have a collision problem. It uses a switched
topology. All of the cables are point to point. One end is on your device
the other is on a switch. The switch has enough performance and bandwidth
to drive all cables at full wire speed.
The switch adds very little
On 06/01/2017 02:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Hi Bertho; I haven't heard any more, so I am wondering if you've found
> any more "magic beans"?
Still looking into options.
There is that persy dayjob taking away attention from the real work ;-)
Seriously, it is exams-period and that requires some
Yes openPowerlink might be a really good choice. I implemented CANopen over UDP
for configuration a few weeks ago and openPowerlink is adapted from CANopen.
The SDO communication from CANopen work really well for configuration and I
guess it should also work well for between machine
something i buy servo from china ... there are 3 possibility:
1) the seller send all kit Delta brand (motor+drive+cable)
2) the seller send Delta Drive but china motor
3) the seller may be is a guy that buy by Hong Kong import office, whitout
tax, and sell the goods on ebay.
In my experience
nothing missed ... only not know the STMBL project it seems quite
simple obtain a calculated angle of joint for send the data to my program
for 18 point delta calibration, so I find these project real interesting. Apart
from that, I'm investigating the possibility of having open industrial
> If Ethernet is "complex" then PowerLink is "very complex" as it is a few
> layers over top of Ethernet.
>
> Is there a list of requirements some place? What are the end points,
> processes that run on a CPU of some kind.
>
> I've been doing this kind of work for ages but you can't select
If Ethernet is "complex" then PowerLink is "very complex" as it is a few
layers over top of Ethernet.
Is there a list of requirements some place? What are the end points,
processes that run on a CPU of some kind.
I've been doing this kind of work for ages but you can't select anything
without
17 matches
Mail list logo