I actually tried this technique previously using the ats675s but I
couldn't get a satisfactory quadrature output, my gear teeth produced more
like a 25-30% on time and 70% off, so clocking the two sensors for real
quadrature was problematic and didn't really provide the result I was
looking
On 11/01/2018 03:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
You don't want to block the hole in the spindle so you are looking for an
encoder with a large hole though it?Is that right?
If the spindle is belt or gear driven you could place the sensor on the
gear or pulley that drives the spindle. You co
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:34:38 +
andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:11, Chris Albertson
> wrote:
> >
> > You don't want to block the hole in the spindle so you are looking for an
> > encoder with a large hole though it?Is that right?
>
> Something which I think ought to work is a
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:11, Chris Albertson wrote:
>
> You don't want to block the hole in the spindle so you are looking for an
> encoder with a large hole though it?Is that right?
Something which I think ought to work is a crank position sensor set.
The rotors look like this, with a magnet
On Thursday 01 November 2018 04:09:36 Chris Albertson wrote:
> You don't want to block the hole in the spindle so you are looking for
> an encoder with a large hole though it?Is that right?
>
> If the spindle is belt or gear driven you could place the sensor on
> the gear or pulley that drives
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 11:20, theman whosoldtheworld
wrote:
>
> thanks to all ... but I prefer use somethings with CE or at least UL
> certifications provided by manufactorer and not by me. so
> > dmm-tech
> seems a good options for my pourpuse .
I _think_ that the DMM drives only work with DMM mo
thanks to all ... but I prefer use somethings with CE or at least UL
certifications provided by manufactorer and not by me. so
> dmm-tech
seems a good options for my pourpuse really I need suggest about
servo-drive for servo-motors bldc framless like ... normally the motor
manufactorer have a
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 03:31, David Berndt wrote:
> That doesn't sound particularly hopeful for me and my plans. I guess maybe
> a more traditional/proven approach of a through-beam sensor with
> interrupting disk and much much lower resolution encoder ring with
> drilled/milled holes might be the
You don't want to block the hole in the spindle so you are looking for an
encoder with a large hole though it?Is that right?
If the spindle is belt or gear driven you could place the sensor on the
gear or pulley that drives the spindle. You could also place a timing
belt puley on the spindle
