On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 05/09/2017 10:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:09 PM, suavesteve wrote:
I've come across
On 05/09/2017 10:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:09 PM, suavesteve wrote:
>>> I've come across this earlier and had created a local patch,
>>
>> Would you please dig that patch out
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 10 May 2017 at 05:15, Evan Foss wrote:
>> Your patch for libmodplug works so linuxcnc-2.7.8 now fails at install
>> instead of build (just like the git head). I am going to call that a
>> win.
>
>
On 10 May 2017 at 05:15, Evan Foss wrote:
> Your patch for libmodplug works so linuxcnc-2.7.8 now fails at install
> instead of build (just like the git head). I am going to call that a
> win.
--prefix _might_ help with that.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:09 PM, suavesteve wrote:
>> I've come across this earlier and had created a local patch,
>
> Would you please dig that patch out and share it?
>
>> Tested with both v3.0.6 and
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:09 PM, suavesteve wrote:
> I've come across this earlier and had created a local patch,
Would you please dig that patch out and share it?
> Tested with both v3.0.6 and v3.1.4 (Latest Stable release)
>
Thanks!
>
> Philip
>
> Evan Foss
On 05/07/2017 07:09 AM, suavesteve wrote:
> I've come across this earlier and had created a local patch,
>
> Tested with both v3.0.6 and v3.1.4 (Latest Stable release)
Thanks Philip/suavesteve for posting that!
It's strange to me that the libmodbus folks went from using a struct
timeval for
I've come across this earlier and had created a local patch,
Tested with both v3.0.6 and v3.1.4 (Latest Stable release)
>From 0b557f7116cd52a2b69e84872588e22577c1b459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Mullen
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 13:52:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add
You're the only one I know of who's looking into this.
I see that you're using libmodbus 3.1.2, all we build and test on is various
3.0 versions.
It looks like an API function changed between 3.0 and 3.1, so you have the
options:
1. Build without modbus support.
2. Figure out how to use the
Is anyone looking into this?
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> 2.7 should build anywhere the master branch (2.8-prerelease) builds, what
>> build error do you get?
>
> Attached
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> 2.7 should build anywhere the master branch (2.8-prerelease) builds, what
> build error do you get?
Attached are the configure and build runs. I tried playing with the
--enable-non-distributable=yes option but it
2.7 should build anywhere the master branch (2.8-prerelease) builds, what build
error do you get?
And how does matter fail to run?
On April 25, 2017 7:01:29 PM MDT, Evan Foss wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
>wrote:
>> On
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 04/23/2017 09:25 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> Ok so I tried
>> LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib64 ./configure --without-libmodbus
>> --with-realtime=uspace --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.7
>> --with-boost-python=py27
>> (all one
On 04/23/2017 09:25 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> Ok so I tried
> LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib64 ./configure --without-libmodbus
> --with-realtime=uspace --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.7
> --with-boost-python=py27
> (all one line) and it still lands in the same failure. I attached the logfile
Chris Radek pointed
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> This looks closer, the relevant part from the config.log is this:
>>
>> configure:8072: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -std=c++11
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> This looks closer, the relevant part from the config.log is this:
>
> configure:8072: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -std=c++11 -I/usr/include/python2.7
> conftest.cpp -lXinerama -lpython2.7 -lboost_python-py27 >&5
>
This looks closer, the relevant part from the config.log is this:
configure:8072: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -std=c++11 -I/usr/include/python2.7
conftest.cpp -lXinerama -lpython2.7 -lboost_python-py27 >&5
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 04/22/2017 09:25 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
>> wrote:
> From the configure --help output:
>
>> --with-boost-python Specify
On 04/22/2017 09:25 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
From the configure --help output:
> --with-boost-python Specify the boost python shared library to use.
> For
>
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 10:37 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/21/2017 01:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
The basics
* I am running Gentoo
On 04/21/2017 10:37 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> On 04/21/2017 01:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>>> The basics
>>> * I am running Gentoo Linux (so it's non-debian)
>>> * Yes I have the development headers installed. Gentoo by
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 01:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> The basics
>> * I am running Gentoo Linux (so it's non-debian)
>> * Yes I have the development headers installed. Gentoo by design
>> requires them. Attached is a file
On 04/21/2017 01:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> The basics
> * I am running Gentoo Linux (so it's non-debian)
> * Yes I have the development headers installed. Gentoo by design
> requires them. Attached is a file called python-boost.text which
> includes all the files in /usr/include/boost/python
>
Hi LinuxCNC,
I am having trouble building from source. I am just trying to build
the simulator to test some things. I am a developer on an open source
pcb layout program and I need to work on g-code. I also want to use
cutsim (https://github.com/aewallin/cutsim) and I need linuxcnc to
build for
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:01 AM, MC Cason wrote:
>
>You need the development files for boost::python. Using `aptitude
> search boost` will show you what files you need.
I am running gentoo so it is emerge --search boost only I already have
boost so I get.
I have
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:40:39AM +, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
>> > It looks like you're missing some python-related packages, namely the
>> > one
You need the development files for boost::python. Using `aptitude
search boost` will show you what files you need.
This should get you what you need:
sudo apt-get install libboost-python-dev
> Ok I took this to mean --disable-python your ./configure has to be
> broken and tried to
On 20/09/15 04:58, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Ah, you're building on Gentoo, I didn't realize that. We do not
> currently have instructions for how to build on Gentoo, unfortunately.
> LinuxCNC currently targets/supports Debian and Debian-derived
> distributions like Ubuntu. There have been
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:40:39AM +, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> > It looks like you're missing some python-related packages, namely the
> > one that provides pyconfig.h and the one that provides _tkinter.so.
>
> Yes I got
On 09/19/2015 07:00 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am trying to build from source. I know this is not advised but I am
> working on debugging a gcode generator and I just want the simulator
> to run on my regular desktop.
>
>
> Compiling emc/task/emctask.cc
> In file included from
Apologies for my reply. I was the stupid human posing the question. When I
read you only wanted the simulator, I thought I would ask why not just run
in a VM, but, I didn't ask in a text friendly way.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015, 10:38 PM Jeff Epler wrote:
> It looks like you're
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> It looks like you're missing some python-related packages, namely the
> one that provides pyconfig.h and the one that provides _tkinter.so.
Yes I got that far. Why does the compile bomb when I try to build with
out
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> On 09/19/2015 07:00 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I am trying to build from source. I know this is not advised but I am
>>>
Hi Folks,
I am trying to build from source. I know this is not advised but I am
working on debugging a gcode generator and I just want the simulator
to run on my regular desktop.
Compiling emc/task/emctask.cc
In file included from /usr/include/boost/python/detail/prefix.hpp:13:0,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 09/19/2015 07:00 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I am trying to build from source. I know this is not advised but I am
>> working on debugging a gcode generator and I just want the simulator
>> to run on my
On 09/19/2015 09:42 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/19/2015 07:00 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am trying to build from
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am trying to build from source. I know this is not advised but I am
> working on debugging a gcode generator and I just want the simulator
> to run on my regular desktop.
Sorry I meant to include this. I
It looks like you're missing some python-related packages, namely the
one that provides pyconfig.h and the one that provides _tkinter.so.
On my Debian Jessie system the relevant packages seem to be
libpython2.7-dev: /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig.h
python-tk:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Kyle Kerr wrote:
> Apologies for my reply. I was the stupid human posing the question. When I
> read you only wanted the simulator, I thought I would ask why not just run
> in a VM, but, I didn't ask in a text friendly way.
It's ok. This has
Stupid human question. Wouldn't running in a VM be quicker, easier, and
less painful?
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015, 9:08 PM Evan Foss wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I am trying to build from source. I know this
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Kyle Kerr wrote:
> Stupid human question. Wouldn't running in a VM be quicker, easier, and
> less painful?
I don't want the over head from that. This is a documented feature of
your code so not being able to build it is a bug.
I did my due
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 09/19/2015 09:42 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
>>> wrote:
On
42 matches
Mail list logo