[Emc-users] CVS Access

2008-05-21 Thread Kenneth Lerman
You're kidding, right? Since the reason that the switch was made from sourceforge was that it was unreliable, one could equally say that NO ONE had access when we used sourceforge. It's been a long time since I used the term plonk, but it's getting close to time to use it again. BTW: I had

Re: [Emc-users] CVS Access

2008-05-21 Thread Dave Engvall
Yep! good fast access on a ping to linuxcnc.org (58 ms), about double that to cvs.linuxcnc.org and no response to http://cvs.linuxcnc.org. Traceroute to http://cvs.linuxcnc.org never even gets the first hop which seems to say there is not a DNS entry for it. Dave On May 21, 2008, at 12:19 PM,

[Emc-users] CVS access - (was Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd)

2007-07-31 Thread Lester Caine
Alex Joni wrote: Several months later - but since there is no CIA feed posting commits in real time, the fact that one only accesses updates now and again is not a problem. Hence there has not really been a need to replace the anonymous SF access since tap downloads can be used. They just

Re: [Emc-users] CVS access - (was Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd)

2007-07-31 Thread Alex Joni
Alex - the problem here is simply that having lost CVS via SF last year, and then not being able to get onto the replacement. *I* just switched off and started using the tar files. I will have to look again for CIA but nothing is documented from the wiki pages I have worked my way through.