Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-18 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 5/18/2012 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Chris Morley > wrote: > >> As for using GIT to keep track of files - yes that would work great but, >> what new user is going to learn about git just to configure the machine? > OK, but on the other hand GIT is such

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-18 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Chris Morley wrote: > As for using GIT to keep track of files - yes that would work great but, > what new user is going to learn about git just to configure the machine? OK, but on the other hand GIT is such a useful habit in all contexts, not just for LinuxCNC m

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread mjb1416
Chris I'll run some tests and let you know the outcome. Mike -Original Message- From: Chris Morley Subj: Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom Date: Fri 18 May 2012 6:08 Size: 1K To: EMC > > If StepConfig added a warning comment line at the top of custom_postgui.hal

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread Chris Morley
> > If StepConfig added a warning comment line at the top of custom_postgui.hal > along the lines of > > # !!! > # WARNING the contents of this file will be overwritten if StepConfig is > run again > # !

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Mike Bennett wrote: > Argh > > StepConfig overwrites custom_postgui.hal with an empty file.  The name > 'custom' suggests it should not. Best practice: use git (or any other version control system) to handle configuration files. I use it for stuff like /etc/*

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread Mike Bennett
If StepConfig added a warning comment line at the top of custom_postgui.hal along the lines of # !!! # WARNING the contents of this file will be overwritten if StepConfig is run again #

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread Viesturs Lācis
2012/5/17 andy pugh : > On 17 May 2012 02:26, Chris Morley wrote: > >> Andy you should qualify that with the point that you wouldn't use stepconf >> right >> from the beginning ! :) > > Starting from scratch with a stepper machine I probably would, actually. > But I doubt I will ever be doing tha

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread andy pugh
On 17 May 2012 02:26, Chris Morley wrote: > Andy you should qualify that with the point that you wouldn't use stepconf > right > from the beginning ! :) Starting from scratch with a stepper machine I probably would, actually. But I doubt I will ever be doing that again. > In this case stepconf

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-17 Thread mjb1416
Chris Time stamped bakups would certainly have helped me out. Luckily my file only had about 20 lines so it will not take long to recreate. Mike -Original Message- From: Chris Morley Subj: Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom Date: Thu 17 May 2012 2:26 Size: 1K To: EMC > I am

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Morley
> I am of the opinion (whilst accepting the validity of other opinions) > that once you have a working configuration then you should completely > stop using stepconf and make any further changes direct in the HAL and > INI files. > > -- > atp > If you can't fix it, you don't own it. > http://ww

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-16 Thread John Thornton
The custom part of the name is misleading and confusing and the name IMHO should just be postgui.hal. And like Andy I believe once your basic setup work is done in stepconf you should never run it again and make custom changes directly to the ini and hal file. John On 5/16/2012 12:51 AM, Mike

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 May 2012 08:54, Mike Bennett wrote: > I'd also edited the machine INI file which I knew would be overwritten, so > I'll create a new file next time and load this in the INI file, so I only > have one file to maintain. I am of the opinion (whilst accepting the validity of other opinions) th

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-16 Thread Mike Bennett
Mike On 16 May 2012 07:06, Chris Morley wrote: > > > > From: mjb1...@gmail.com > > Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:51:14 +0100 > > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: [Emc-users] Not so custom > > > > Argh > > > > StepConfig over

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-15 Thread Chris Morley
> From: mjb1...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:51:14 +0100 > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Emc-users] Not so custom > > Argh > > StepConfig overwrites custom_postgui.hal with an empty file. The name > 'custom' suggests it s

Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-15 Thread Viesturs Lācis
2012/5/16 Mike Bennett : > Argh > > StepConfig overwrites custom_postgui.hal with an empty file.  The name > 'custom' suggests it should not. StepConf overwrites any files it is set to create. And it is set to create custom_postgui.hal, when new config is created. You can always save that fi

[Emc-users] Not so custom

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Bennett
Argh StepConfig overwrites custom_postgui.hal with an empty file. The name 'custom' suggests it should not. Mike -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security