On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 18:04 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
if I can insert those few lines of code after the M6 T# command.
If you add:
[EMCIO]
TOOL_CHANGE_AT_G30 = 1
Then M6 will move to the G30 position, which you've cleverly set right
above the probe switch. Admittedly, you must then call the
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 04:49:03 PM Ed Nisley did opine:
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 18:04 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
if I can insert those few lines of code after the M6 T# command.
If you add:
[EMCIO]
TOOL_CHANGE_AT_G30 = 1
That is I believe, a new one to me, thanks Ed. I'm
On 25 January 2012 22:09, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
I am down to adding the subroutine call after the M6 T#
Even that is potentially optional:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/devel/html/remap/structure.html
(but probably not worth the trouble unless you are going to want to
_always_
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 22:20 +, andy pugh wrote:
Even that is potentially optional:
Oh, *wow*... Yet Another Way to confuse myself beyond recognition.
I must put the tool probe switch somewhere more-or-less fixed before I
start invoking that code, but I like what it can do!
--
Ed
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 07:11:35PM -0500, Ed Nisley wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 22:20 +, andy pugh wrote:
Even that is potentially optional:
Oh, *wow*... Yet Another Way to confuse myself beyond recognition.
I must put the tool probe switch somewhere more-or-less fixed before I
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:12 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Its doing all moves on the .bot. files
in negative X from the reference point
I'm pretty sure there's a checkbox along the way that reads Mirror X
axis to make that answer come out right without any further attention.
The Eagle gerbv274x
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 05:55:14 PM Ed Nisley did opine:
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:12 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Its doing all moves on the .bot. files
in negative X from the reference point
I'm pretty sure there's a checkbox along the way that reads Mirror X
axis to make that answer
gene heskett wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2012 09:01:21 PM Jon Elson did opine:
I just tried these two additions to my .ini file, then restarted emc while
the machine was within about a thou of zero on all axises. But on the
restart, the home flag wasn't set where it was restarted,
On Monday, January 23, 2012 02:22:35 PM Jon Elson did opine:
gene heskett wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2012 09:01:21 PM Jon Elson did opine:
I just tried these two additions to my .ini file, then restarted emc
while the machine was within about a thou of zero on all axises.
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 14:56 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
by destroying that known position as the homed flags are set.
Although I *do* have home switches on the Sherline, I also inserted
[TRAJ]
NO_FORCE_HOMING = 1
So it doesn't enforce the must-home-before-moving rule.
Axis then starts up
2012/1/23 Ed Nisley ed.08.nis...@pobox.com:
[TRAJ]
NO_FORCE_HOMING = 1
Axis then starts up wherever it shut down, with the previous position in
place, and runs just fine.
So are You telling that this line also tells Axis to remember joint
positions on shutdown or do You have something
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 22:34 +0200, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
also tells Axis to remember joint positions on shutdown
It's a simpleminded XYZA Sherline mill that wouldn't know what to do
with a joint if it saw one...
--
Ed
http://softsolder.com
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:02:02 AM Ed Nisley did opine:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 14:56 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
by destroying that known position as the homed flags are set.
Although I *do* have home switches on the Sherline, I also inserted
[TRAJ]
NO_FORCE_HOMING = 1
So it
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:17:44 AM Viesturs Lācis did opine:
2012/1/23 Ed Nisley ed.08.nis...@pobox.com:
[TRAJ]
NO_FORCE_HOMING = 1
Axis then starts up wherever it shut down, with the previous position
in place, and runs just fine.
So are You telling that this line also tells
On 22 January 2012 03:51, John Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca wrote:
Does it actually have a homing switch or not?
I read somewhere that the HOME_SEQUENCE=-1 told LinuxCNC (smile) not to
home. Am I correct in that assumption?
Yes, but that leaves the axis unhomed, whereas you want it to home
Andy, Jon;
I read somewhere that the HOME_SEQUENCE=-1 told LinuxCNC (smile) not to
home. Am I correct in that assumption?
Yes, but that leaves the axis unhomed, whereas you want it to home
without moving.
As Jon has said, you need to have a positive value for the homing
sequence
On Sunday, January 22, 2012 12:03:07 PM andy pugh did opine:
On 22 January 2012 03:51, John Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca wrote:
Does it actually have a homing switch or not?
I read somewhere that the HOME_SEQUENCE=-1 told LinuxCNC (smile) not
to home. Am I correct in that assumption?
On Sunday, January 22, 2012 09:01:21 PM Jon Elson did opine:
John Stewart wrote:
Hi Andy;
Does it actually have a homing switch or not?
No, no homing switch.
I read somewhere that the HOME_SEQUENCE=-1 told LinuxCNC (smile) not
to home. Am I correct in that assumption? Or, is
On 22 January 2012 01:27, John A. Stewart astew...@crc.ca wrote:
Here is my hand-edited ini file - any silly/obvious mistakes here?
Does it actually have a homing switch or not?
--
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.
Hi Andy;
Does it actually have a homing switch or not?
No, no homing switch.
I read somewhere that the HOME_SEQUENCE=-1 told LinuxCNC (smile) not to home.
Am I correct in that assumption? Or, is there commands in there that say
don't home but you should be homed in there?
Cross fingers
John Stewart wrote:
Hi Andy;
Does it actually have a homing switch or not?
No, no homing switch.
I read somewhere that the HOME_SEQUENCE=-1 told LinuxCNC (smile) not to
home. Am I correct in that assumption? Or, is there commands in there that
say don't home but you should
21 matches
Mail list logo
