Re: [Emc-users] NML communication

> On 22/07/2017 03:58, Nicklas Karlsson wrote: > > With 0MQ protocol ? > Yes, that is BeagleBone Black and ZeroMQ. Great, this make me really happy. I will take a look on both raspberry and beagle bone, I want SPIs, UARTs, ethernet and maybe in the future ethercat. Maybe I give NML one try more

[Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On 15.07.17 12:48, Gene Heskett wrote: > Screen updates in the postgui stuff are I believe that main reason for > over-runs as the pi's video is framebuffer=damned slow. One of the > reasons I am considering a rock64, its cpu is about 30% faster, and > can be had with 4Gb of dram @ $44.95. The

Re: [Emc-users] NML communication

On 22/07/2017 03:58, Nicklas Karlsson wrote: With 0MQ protocol ? Yes, that is BeagleBone Black and ZeroMQ. I agree, 7" screen is too small. Good for 3D printing, but not for a more complex CNC machine. With so small buttons, there is risk of harmful mistakes. Also, I will add MPG in the future

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On 22 July 2017 at 08:28, Erik Christiansen wrote: > I just ran it on my Udoo X86 Advanced, and it gives 22.3 seconds. Have you found a way to make use of the Udon "Arduino" co-processor in a LinuxCNC context? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On 22.07.17 08:38, andy pugh wrote: > On 22 July 2017 at 08:28, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > > I just ran it on my Udoo X86 Advanced, and it gives 22.3 seconds. I've since seen that there is a fourth variant, the Advanced+, and that is the one with the 14-15 second

[Emc-users] Hermle two speed motor wiring.

Hi Guys I posted something earlier about my Hermle vertical shaft motor wiring. It seems like a multi spindle motor. Can someone help me with a wiring diagram please? It only has 6 terminals like a normal 3 phase motor but the ohm readings are odd. Thanks in advance Johann

Re: [Emc-users] hal_manualtoolchange

On Saturday 22 July 2017 22:01:15 Nicklas Karlsson wrote: > Could you send your configuration files? > Might not be needed Nicklas. For lack of anything else to do, I just got thru nuking what was in the pi's halfile, and replaced it with the same stanza from TLM's hal file, and it at least

[Emc-users] hal include

Gene My googlefoo is failing to find anything about hal files using includes, and my fuzzy mem thinks you were doing this. Have you used hal files with included sub-files? thx tomp tjtr33 -- Check out the vibrant tech

Re: [Emc-users] hal_manualtoolchange

Could you send your configuration files? On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 19:21:40 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings everybody; > > Noisy, wet Saturday evening in progress. > > Over on the pi, I am attempting to combine enough code, and using 92 > offsets, make a brass 8mmx1.0

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

> The problem with the Pi3 is that people are trying to simultaneously run > both a real time controller process and a graphic desktop system.Either > of these might work but not both at once. Real time is enough and I actually think something slower could be used. Graphics I would say have

[Emc-users] hal_manualtoolchange

Greetings everybody; Noisy, wet Saturday evening in progress. Over on the pi, I am attempting to combine enough code, and using 92 offsets, make a brass 8mmx1.0 bolt for the cathead with a single file, and 3 tool changes. So I have noted the default net settings in the config I started out

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On 07/22/2017 11:01 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: It may have been, were I will to learn a new program. New program? Machinekit IS LinuxCNC, at least as far as the g-code end of things is. HAL is the same, Linux is the same. There are significant differences in rtapi, but few venture into there.

[Emc-users] Present state of Tormach PathPilot relative to LinuxCNC

I am assuming that we are not too far from the release of v2.8. That said, my question is, has Tormach been updating PathPilot as LinuxCNC has moved forward or is it still a heavily patched and modified v2.6.x? Or maybe I should be asking: Is there a relatively simple way to run a PathPilot

Re: [Emc-users] Hermle two speed motor wiring.

On Saturday 22 July 2017 17:54:51 Johann Beukes wrote: > Hi Guys > I posted something earlier about my Hermle vertical shaft motor > wiring. It seems like a multi spindle motor. > Can someone help me with a wiring diagram please? It only has 6 > terminals like a normal 3 phase motor but the ohm

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On Saturday 22 July 2017 08:00:10 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 22.07.17 06:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I did get an up board. SOB has a uefi bios, and would not boot > > anything I tried. So I went trolling thru the bios looking for a way > > to turn that crap off. The only thing I could find

Re: [Emc-users] NML communication

On 07/22/2017 03:26 AM, Frederic RIBLE wrote: On 22/07/2017 03:58, Nicklas Karlsson wrote: With 0MQ protocol ? Yes, that is BeagleBone Black and ZeroMQ. I agree, 7" screen is too small. Have you checked out Touchy? It actually is quite usable on a 7" touch screen. You do have to have a run

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

The problem with the Pi3 is that people are trying to simultaneously run both a real time controller process and a graphic desktop system.Either of these might work but not both at once. The Pi3 really is best when run "headless" with no monitor/keyboard/mouse plugged in. Real time processes

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On Saturday 22 July 2017 03:28:17 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 15.07.17 12:48, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Screen updates in the postgui stuff are I believe that main reason > > for over-runs as the pi's video is framebuffer=damned slow. One of > > the reasons I am considering a rock64, its cpu is

Re: [Emc-users] Pi performance bottlenecks [Was: configuration via Gschem]

On 22.07.17 06:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > I did get an up board. SOB has a uefi bios, and would not boot anything I > tried. So I went trolling thru the bios looking for a way to turn that > crap off. The only thing I could find was to disable the tcp chip. > Bricked it. According to their web