On 7 June 2012 05:11, Ralph Stirling ralph.stirl...@wallawalla.edu wrote:
I'm putting together a little 3-axis system with a horizontal rotary
table (like a C axis), an X axis, and a Z axis. I'd like to program
it as XYZ, though, so I need some kinematics to convert XYZ to XZC
You might not
Bill,
While the Do While example in the manual does work, unless you changed
it, it's not very graphic. I have changed the example to give some feed
back if you test run the code. Within an hour or so the online docs
should have the improved example.
John
On 6/6/2012 10:38 AM, Cathrine
Well I have convinced myself that having a standby generator of
sufficient size to run the whole house is a good thing. I am now the
owner of a 15Kw 2cyl deutz diesel generator. It is a 12 wire generator
and at the moment it is set up for 208 120. After reading some on the
different wiring
Nice.
I have a Deutz engine on an air compressor. They are very reliable.
A 12 wire is the ultimate setup. Can't go wrong with that.
That engine should sip fuel.
Dave
On 6/7/2012 8:03 AM, John Thornton wrote:
Well I have convinced myself that having a standby generator of
sufficient size
On 7 June 2012 14:00, charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com wrote:
i see only two approaches: the rotation axes are purely for indexing between
various angular offsets without any coordination of other movements (i.e.
stay clear of spinning mechanism), or incorporate the absolute cartesian
Hi Guys;
I did notice yesterday while cutting that 4mmx0.7 thread, which btw came
out real nice, that the spindle speed you start at should not be changed
during the run as it will widen the cut thread, leaving a distorted profile
at the root of the thread. I had started it at an S200 and had
Would it be possible to write my own hal component that read the values from
the file?
Sent from my iPod
On Jun 7, 2012, at 3:35 AM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 June 2012 19:29, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
O100 IF [#5220 EQ 1]
M66 E0 Q#5221
M66 E1 Q#5222
…
O100
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:17:32 +0100
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 June 2012 14:00, charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com wrote:
i see only two approaches: the rotation axes are purely for
indexing between various angular offsets without any coordination
of other movements (i.e. stay
If you dont mind writing some C code, I think you should extend halui to do it.
Read the values you want from the stat buffers and export them to hal pins.
See how halui reports the axis positions for an example.
These changes should go in the master branch, not in 2.5.
- Reply message
i did in fact end up using inverse time feed when my understanding of the
linear/rotational axes relations failed. that worked ok, but it was not a
satisfying closed form of solution to the problem in general.
in easier cases, abc is parallel to xyz. so you'd want to know the xyz position
of
On 7 June 2012 16:36, charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com wrote:
in easier cases, abc is parallel to xyz. so you'd want to know the xyz
position of the cutter point relative to the xyz positon of a rotation axis,
How do we tell LinuxCNC / G-code where the rotation axes are in space?
Frequently
another fun translation problem: instead of x and y axes, you have a c1 axis
on top of a c2 axis with the two c axes separated by some given r. presumably
a spindle is centered the same r away from one of the c's so that a whole xy
area of 2r can be reached by rotations of the two c's.
---
I think mach has a place to tell what the 'radius' is of the rotary axis
so the feed rate is calculated based on that. (but they cannot do kins
and such) Inverse time really is the only way to go - that is what the
big boys use.
sam
On 6/7/2012 10:49 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 7 June 2012
I dont think these ideas will work/produce sensible results
- Andy's idea conveys the readahead-time setting of #5220
- halui wont be able to report anything useful because the emctstatus message
doesnt contain that value (#5220)
the way I understand it all offsets (coordinate, tool, axis) are
Michael is absolutely correct about this:
...so Andy's scheme will report the last offset active, not the current one
being used relative to execution
In fact, any attempt to display the G5x offset, the spindle S command, or the
feedrate F command, the modal G94/95 (feed per unit/feed per
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:39:12 -0400, you wrote:
I did notice yesterday while cutting that 4mmx0.7 thread, which btw came
out real nice, that the spindle speed you start at should not be changed
during the run as it will widen the cut thread, leaving a distorted profile
at the root of the thread.
Hi John:
Thanks for the feedback!
I have found my mistake and all is working as should be.
Will look at ur new example, too.
Bill
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 06:13:16 -0500
John Thornton bjt...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill,
While the Do While example in the manual does work, unless you changed
it,
Thanks for the answer Andy, I found the problem and all is working...
Bill
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:53:53 +0100
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 June 2012 16:38, Cathrine Hribar bhri...@bresnan.net wrote:
have run into a problem trying to do a loop. when I use the sample in the
On Thursday, June 07, 2012 05:30:43 PM Steve Blackmore did opine:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:39:12 -0400, you wrote:
I did notice yesterday while cutting that 4mmx0.7 thread, which btw
came out real nice, that the spindle speed you start at should not be
changed during the run as it will widen the
I have two welding robots for sale in Berkeley, IL (near Chicago). I think
that you can use them for just about anything.
http://igor.chudov.com/misc/ebay/tmp/Blackhawk-Steel/IMG_9630.JPG
http://igor.chudov.com/misc/ebay/tmp/Blackhawk-Steel/IMG_9631.JPG
Let me know if interested.
PS. my EMC2
On 6/7/2012 8:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 7 June 2012 13:03, John Thorntonbjt...@gmail.com wrote:
I
think I'll just leave it at 208.
Does that give you a Wye/Star to connect to ground?
Why not run it 440 star and leave out the step-up transformer?
That reactor is
21 matches
Mail list logo