On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Erik Christiansen
wrote:
>
> Yebbut, what on earth do we use when flashplayer won't cut it any more?
>
>
HTML5 replaces Flash for the most part.
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the
On 16.07.15 02:09, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> On 7/16/2015 2:02 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > My problems with iceweasel have only been with flashplayer, but this
> > stuff does seem to be going steadily backwards.
>
> Apple declared Flash to be "insecure" and "obsolete", so Adobe ended
> develop
On Thursday 16 July 2015 04:02:43 Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.07.15 08:44, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I'll put chromium back in to see if that works. Yes it works. So
> > what the heck is blocking iceweasel?
>
> At the risk of being indelicate, I'd guess "That's alimentary,
> Watson."
;-)
> My
On 7/16/2015 2:02 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.07.15 08:44, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I'll put chromium back in to see if that works. Yes it works. So
>> what the heck is blocking iceweasel?
>
> At the risk of being indelicate, I'd guess "That's alimentary, Watson."
>
> My problems with icew
On 15.07.15 08:44, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I'll put chromium back in to see if that works. Yes it works. So
> what the heck is blocking iceweasel?
At the risk of being indelicate, I'd guess "That's alimentary, Watson."
My problems with iceweasel have only been with flashplayer, but this
stuff doe
On 07/14/2015 10:34 PM, Pete Matos wrote:
> http://www.cui.com/catalog/components/encoders/incremental/modular will
> these work?
>
>
They do "work", but have a significant lag under
acceleration. This lag can be up to 5 ms, then the velocity
overshoots badly so that the position can catch up.
I forgot to mention I had those AMT encoders on my RF45 cnc mill. I must
say that they seemed to work very well. Most remarably once I had built
some nice aluminum enclosures for the encoders and had the wires running
thru surgical tubing to protect them in the full flood coolant environment.
well
On 15 July 2015 at 17:21, Ken Strauss wrote:
> The site says " Minimum order quantity: 280 ".
So it does. That's what I get from trying to US-ify a link. This is where I
started off from:
http://uk.farnell.com/avago-technologies/aeat-6010-a06/encoder-magnetic-10bit-12000rpm/dp/2467467
Where t
Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:46 AM
>> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] looking for inexpensive modular encoder
>>
>> On 14 July 2015 at 18:37, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for any pointers,
>>
>> http://www.newark
The site says " Minimum order quantity: 280 ". I don't have that many mills!
> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:46 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] l
On 14 July 2015 at 18:37, Jon Elson wrote:
> Thanks for any pointers,
http://www.newark.com/avago-technologies/aeat-6012-a06/rotary-encoder-12000rpm/dp/51M7114?ost=AEAT-6012
Is absolute and serial output (which is actually ideal for a brushless
motor).
The Avago website is blocked from work, s
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 04:30:52 Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.07.15 00:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 July 2015 23:34:25 Pete Matos wrote:
> > > http://www.cui.com/catalog/components/encoders/incremental/modular
> > > will these work?
> >
> > I'd like to look at this stuff Pete, bu
On 15.07.15 00:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 July 2015 23:34:25 Pete Matos wrote:
> > http://www.cui.com/catalog/components/encoders/incremental/modular
> > will these work?
>
> I'd like to look at this stuff Pete, but my iceweasel, when I click on
> save link as, does not download the
On Tuesday 14 July 2015 23:34:25 Pete Matos wrote:
> http://www.cui.com/catalog/components/encoders/incremental/modular
> will these work?
I'd like to look at this stuff Pete, but my iceweasel, when I click on
save link as, does not download the pdf, but the html wrapper code.
Is this an icewea
On 7/14/2015 9:41 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 11:59 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>> I'm not actually answering your question; but have you looked at the
>> shaft encoders on Ebay recently?
>> There were some $15 units the last time I looked. It might make sense
>> to adapt to some of those?
>>
>>
http://www.cui.com/catalog/components/encoders/incremental/modular will
these work?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 09:45 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> >
> > I used to be a fan of USD. I made my lathe encoders using their 2" disks
> > and sensors and they are st
On 07/14/2015 09:45 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
>
> I used to be a fan of USD. I made my lathe encoders using their 2" disks
> and sensors and they are still working well.
> http://www.wallacecompany.com/cnc_lathe/HNC/1-1a.jpg
>
> I still like the idea of using disks and sensors and making the rest
On 07/14/2015 06:41 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> What I'm looking for is a 1000 cycle/rev encoder with index
> that fits on a 1/4" motor shaft. For some odd reason, the
> Avago part cannot be had in 1000 cycle/rev with the 1/4"
> shaft, although a number of other resolutions are available.
> Renco and
On 07/14/2015 11:59 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
> I'm not actually answering your question; but have you looked at the
> shaft encoders on Ebay recently?
> There were some $15 units the last time I looked. It might make sense
> to adapt to some of those?
>
> $43 seems like a lot of money for the modular
I'm not actually answering your question; but have you looked at the
shaft encoders on Ebay recently?
There were some $15 units the last time I looked. It might make sense
to adapt to some of those?
$43 seems like a lot of money for the modular units considering what is
delivered.
Dave
On 7/
hello, all,
I've been selling some Automation tech brushless DC motors
with encoders to go with my servo amps. Lately I've been
using HEDS-5640#A06 encoders from Avnet, which are the
highest resolution I can get with a 1/4" shaft. There used
to be inexpensive alternates from US Digital and R
21 matches
Mail list logo
