[Emc-users] One more Stepconf problem

2007-12-11 Thread Alan Condit
=candcnc_pinout.hal =my-mill.hal 2d1 loadrt scope_rt 4,5c3,5 loadrt hal_parport cfg=0x0378 loadrt motmod base_period_nsec=6 servo_period_nsec=100 traj_period_nsec=1000 key=111 num_joints=3 --- loadrt hal_parport cfg=0x378 loadrt probe_parport loadrt motmod

Re: [Emc-users] One more Stepconf problem

2007-12-11 Thread Chris Radek
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:43:42PM +, Alan Condit wrote: Can anyone see what is keeping the x axis from running??? Well what did you do that fixed Y? - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net

Re: [Emc-users] One more Stepconf problem

2007-12-11 Thread Alan Condit
Chris Radek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:43:42PM +, Alan Condit wrote: Can anyone see what is keeping the x axis from running??? Well what did you do that fixed Y? Chris, I rebooted the machine. Honestly, one time when I would start it up Y would work and

Re: [Emc-users] One more Stepconf problem

2007-12-11 Thread Kirk Wallace
I had an interference problem that was corrected by putting a filter on the power input to the spindle VFD (HNC lathe). Only the spindle index was showing a problem. I am thinking that different systems have different thresholds of susceptibility. Maybe the source of your problem has a threshold

Re: [Emc-users] One more Stepconf problem

2007-12-11 Thread Alan Condit
Kirk Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had an interference problem that was corrected by putting a filter on the power input to the spindle VFD (HNC lathe). Only the spindle index was showing a problem. I am thinking that different systems have different thresholds of susceptibility.

Re: [Emc-users] One more Stepconf problem

2007-12-11 Thread Alan Condit
Alan Condit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After reading the documentation, I believe that I had mis-interpreted the meaning of dirsetup and dirhold. I tried these parameters for my drives: steplen = 25000 stepspace = 25000 dirsetup = 2000 dirhold =