Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-25 Thread Chris Epicier
Dear Andy and tom3p Spent now a couple of hours more on this. I looked at the emc 2.3.3 and earlier versions release notes. Among other points named O words is listed. Do I need toupgrade from 2.2.8 ? Greets Chris

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing SOLVED!

2009-10-25 Thread Chris Epicier
Hi all Spent now a couple of hours more on this. I looked at the emc 2.3.3 and earlier versions release notes. Among other points named O words is listed. Do I need toupgrade from 2.2.8 ? Got it sorted out: you *need* EMC2 version 2.3.3 to get the sample code of this:

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing SOLVED!

2009-10-25 Thread Chris Epicier
Just one more thing: make sure your subprogramfiles are all written in lowercases. So, if something like MySubProgramFile is called, axis looks for a file like mysubprogramfile thus mot considering uppercases. In my understanding, this should not happen. Is this a bug? greets chris Hi all

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing SOLVED!

2009-10-25 Thread Kenneth Lerman
EMC converts every line to lowercase only when it reads the line. It also removes blank spaces when parsing the gcode. That is apparently part of the rs274ngc standard. For that reason, the behavior you are seeing is not a bug. A person with more energy than I have could add an option to do

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-25 Thread Andy Pugh
2009/10/25 Chris Epicier seuch...@yahoo.de: Spent now a couple of hours more on this. I looked at the emc 2.3.3 and earlier versions release notes. Among other points named O words is listed. Do I need toupgrade from 2.2.8 ? I know it does work with 2.3.3. I have no evidence either way

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-21 Thread Chris Epicier
Dear Andy and tom3p Thank you very much for the quick reply. Stephen had pointed me to this also, I have amended the files accordingly and still get Bad Number Format. I was fiddling around with this last night, and got it working for my application. I suspect that the reason you

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-11 Thread Andy Pugh
2009/9/30 Chris Epicier seuch...@yahoo.de: Thank you very much for the quick reply. Stephen had pointed me to this also, I have amended the files accordingly and still get Bad Number Format. I was fiddling around with this last night, and got it working for my application. I suspect that the

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-11 Thread Alex Joni
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing 2009/9/30 Chris Epicier seuch...@yahoo.de: Thank you very much for the quick reply. Stephen had pointed me to this also, I have amended the files accordingly and still get Bad Number Format. I was fiddling around with this last

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-06 Thread Chris Epicier
Dear Ken To generate lots of debug messages:    In your.ini file section [RS274NGC] add the line       LOG_LEVEL = 999 I guess this is wat I was looking for! thanks!       Then the file emc_log will get a log containing the interpreter activity regarding o-words, subroutines, etc.

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-05 Thread Chris Epicier
Dear Steve Try removing the O sub/endsub lines and loading the files individually. That should get you a line number where the error occurs (I hope). The files were actually converted into subfiles from standalone files. The standalone files work without any error and do not show O

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-05 Thread Kenneth Lerman
To generate lots of debug messages: In your.ini file section [RS274NGC] add the line LOG_LEVEL = 999 Then the file emc_log will get a log containing the interpreter activity regarding o-words, subroutines, etc. You probably don't want this enabled when you are doing something

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-04 Thread Chris Epicier
alone files. So I do not believe it is actually within the sub files. greets chris Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: axis and batch processing An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: Mittwoch, 30. September 2009, 19:48 Chris

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-04 Thread Ian W. Wright
Chris, More than 2/3 of the digest I just got was taken up by your one message - will you PLEASE try to cut down the previous posts which are attached to your message and not just hit the 'reply' button. Thanks Ian

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-03 Thread Jan Van Gilsen
there that shoudl not be. Besides, all files rune smoothly as truely standa alone files. So I do not believe it is actually within the sub files. greets chris Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: axis and batch processing An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Datum

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-02 Thread Jan Van Gilsen
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: axis and batch processing An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: Mittwoch, 30. September 2009, 19:48 Chris, in file labels.ngc, line 1: Olabels sub Should be: Olabels sub and: Olabels endsub Should

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-02 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
Chris Epicier wrote: Hi all I am in the process of cutting parts, due out soon. Should be doing million things, other than keepin my cnc busy. I checked and rechecked the syntax in bot, master, labels and other files. I cannot find a mistake there. Is there a way I can debug this? A way to

Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: WG: Re: axis and batch processing

2009-10-01 Thread Chris Epicier
not be. Besides, all files rune smoothly as truely standa alone files. So I do not believe it is actually within the sub files. greets chris Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] WG: Re: axis and batch processing An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: Mittwoch