Joseph Salowey wrote:
> that consensus. If you do not support adoption of
> draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-03.txt as WG item please say so by 2359UTC on
> 30 November 2018 (and say why).
I don't think that this was decided.
At least, I did not find a message about this in the archives!
I
Hi EMU,
This new draft from Martin Thomson is solving a lot of the problems with large
certificate chains in TLS, at least for EAP-TLS 1.3. I think the EMU working
group should discuss if this draft solves the problems of the EMU working
group, if not we should try to influence the draft so it
I think draft-thomson-tls-sic-00 solves all the problems that the EMU wg have
identified. The draft only works with EAP-TLS 1.3 but I think that is fine. Any
implementation willing to update the TLS code, should update to TLS 1.3. I
agree with Martin Thompson that the TLS WG should not spend