On 01/17/2012 06:35 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
...
We can't remove cloneTemplate until it is removed from the UI or else we
will break functionality. For now we are just going to ensure that it
works as it always has until the UI is ready to remove it.
If by ensure you mean you are going to do
On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Top Posting:
From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one that make sense.
We try to do as much as we can,
and on each problematic case, we make him aware and let him decide.
On 01/24/2012 06:33 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
On 24/01/12 18:28, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 01/24/2012 05:20 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 01/24/2012 03:47 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
I'm experiencing severe latency issues with gerrit.ovirt.org - am I the
only one ?
Currently experiencing it as well
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
Cc: Miki Kenneth mkenn...@redhat.com, engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 11:41:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] ovirt core MOM
- Original Message -
On 01
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
Hi
We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined as an open
issue in the feature wiki) is:
What happens to a 3.1 VM running on 3.1 Cluster when it is moved to a 3.0
On 02/02/2012 12:25 PM, Daniel Erez wrote:
...
6. permissions not available for disks?
at all?
what do you mean power user would be able to attach them by their
type?
does it mean they can associate any shared disk in the system? I hope
i'm misunderstanding, as doesn't make sense to me.
or is
On 02/02/2012 07:16 PM, Jon Choate wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:19 AM, Maor wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:01 PM, Jon Choate wrote:
Given the changes for multiple storage domains, do we want to allow a
user to specify multiple storage domains per disk when creating or
importing a template?
Otherwise the
On 02/02/2012 05:13 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
If they are the same, then please use the term 'image'.
As I said - no technical problem doing that, however in the engine we
use the term Disk and the current name of the relevant VMs sub-tab
is Disks and the name of the new main tab would be Disks
On 02/02/2012 01:35 PM, Daniel Erez wrote:
...
1. I don't see why a disk name should be unique. I don't think it's
enforceable under any normal circumstances: If user A decided to call
his disk 'system', user B who is completely unaware of A cannot call
his
disk 'system' ? It should be unique at
On 02/05/2012 02:14 PM, Maor wrote:
...
3. The synchronization/clustering of shared raw disk between VMs will
be managed in the file system.
either i don't understand what this mean, or it could be read with a
misleading meaning.
Maybe the following rephrase will be more accurate: The
On 02/05/2012 03:40 PM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
...
4. VM Pools
VM Pools are always based (at least today) on templates, and
templates
have no shared disks.
I'd just block attaching a shared disk to a VM which is part of a
pool
(unless there is a very interesting use case meriting this)
If there
On 02/05/2012 02:57 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
...
Isn't the VM version derived from the version of the cluster on
which it was last edited?
For example: you've created a VM on a cluster v3.0. When it is
running on a v3.2 cluster, is there any reason to change its
version?
When it is edited, then
On 02/07/2012 04:26 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
Hi,
I went through setting Eclipse IDE for engine development recently.
After getting the maven build to work, and after importing all projects into
eclipse, following setup is required to get rid of all compilation errors
reported by eclipse:
On 02/09/2012 11:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/09/2012 09:33 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/09/2012 10:31 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
snip
so this means we need to ask the user for linux guests if they want
single head or multiple heads when they choose multi monitor?
We could ask
Hi,
The following wiki describes the approach i'm suggesting for adding
gluster support in phases to ovirt.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/AddingGlusterSupportToOvirt
comments welcome.
Thanks,
Itamar
___
Engine-devel mailing list
On 02/10/2012 04:42 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
All,
I would like to move some of the oVirt tools into their own GIT repos so
that they are easier to manage/maintain. In particular, I would like to
move the ovirt-log-collector, ovirt-iso-uploader, and
ovirt-image-uploader each into their own GIT
On 02/12/2012 12:41 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
The Plan:
Step 1: Create naked GIT repos on oVirt.org for the 3 tools.
Step 2: Link git repos to gerrit.
above two are same step - create a project in gerrit.
I'll do that if list doesn't have any objections by monday.
Step 3: Populate naked GIT
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like
On 02/14/2012 02:57 PM, Jaroslav Henner wrote:
Greetings.
I'm an automation tester in charge of testing SDK, my problem is that I
cannot influence the objects that are created without so called monkey
patching (google that and you will see what it means) the
ovirtsdk.infrastructure.brokers.*. I
On 02/14/2012 09:48 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yair Zaslavskyyzasl...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:20:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote
On 02/14/2012 09:20 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org
On 02/14/2012 07:44 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 11:44, Maor wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:17 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 13/02/12 19:44, Maor wrote:
On 02/12/2012 07:03 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 02/02/12 17:15, Maor wrote:
Hello all,
The shared raw disk feature description can be found
On 02/15/2012 12:20 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
...
I think we're approaching this the wrong way.
There are 2 possible problems we're trying to solve here and having
the original shared disk as part of the template is the wrong
solution for both.
The first problem is - user wants to attach the
On 02/15/2012 07:02 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 15/02/12 18:28, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
A short summary from the call today, please correct me if I forgot or
misunderstood something.
Ayal argued that the failed host/storagedomain should be reactivated
by a
On 02/15/2012 06:30 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:15:27AM -0500, Jon Choate wrote:
I'd like to add to that:
If you give at patch the verified flag this implies that you have:
1. pulled the patch locally and ensured that it builds
2. have run all the unit
On 02/16/2012 11:35 AM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
...
why does this matter if cluster is mixed?
to inform a potential migration problem
i.e., wouldn't this be interesting per host, that a network which
could
be bridgeless http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Design/Network/SetupNetworks/is
bridged to
On 02/26/2012 02:38 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/26/2012 02:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 10:06 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
Hi all,
I modified the Wiki pages of this feature:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/CloneVmFromSnapshot
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features
On 02/26/2012 03:20 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
...
4. MLA - what permission does one need to have on source VM/snapsot to
clone it?
if a non-owner can clone a VM/snapshot, and become owner of the new
entity, need to make sure no privilege escalation flows exist.
is the intent to share the code of
On 02/26/2012 03:24 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/26/2012 03:19 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/26/2012 03:20 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
...
4. MLA - what permission does one need to have on source VM/snapsot to
clone it?
if a non-owner can clone a VM/snapshot, and become owner of the new
entity
On 03/13/2012 08:36 PM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:
...
1. affected components - isn't vdsm aware of this as well wrt disk lock
protection (appears in both urls)
You right, Backend sends VDSM an indication when ever we create a VM
whether the disk is shared or not.
I Added the OVirt Node, as a related
On 03/15/2012 01:49 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
I'd be happy to review them, but someone else will have to +2 them.
giving +1 to patches helps maintainers in their review as well.
___
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@ovirt.org
On 03/15/2012 05:03 PM, Andrew Wells wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Michael Pasternak mpast...@redhat.com
mailto:mpast...@redhat.com wrote:
...
Is the api-power-shell
https://rhevm.example.com:8443/rhevm-api-powershell still in 3.0? do I
need to install it? Or is this the /api now?
://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2012-March/001159.html
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2012-March/001158.html
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Wells agwells0...@gmail.com
mailto:agwells0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
On 03/18/2012 11:27 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 03/18/2012 10:43 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 03/18/2012 10:21 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/18/2012 09:33 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
the question is Management/Migration/Storage/Display can be
non-bridged?, if so,
bridgedtrue|false/bridged
On 03/26/2012 09:53 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
1. The column listing value is reloadable is redundant. Whether or not a value is
reloadable or not is defined in the actual Engine code. Values that are currently not
reloadable might become reloadable in the future. Putting this is the db just
On 02/21/2012 05:11 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
Hello all,
The 'Import VM/Template More Than Once' feature description can be found under
the following link:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/ImportMoreThanOnce
Please review, and feel free to share your comments and thoughts.
1. Add
On 03/29/2012 10:05 AM, Muli Salem wrote:
Thanks for the comments, I updated the wiki page accordingly:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/ReloadableConfiguration
1. Instead of the new DB column is_reloadable -- Annotation to ConfigValues.
2. Found a way to update the Quartz jobs, at least
On 03/29/2012 11:59 AM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
On 29/03/12 10:54, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/29/2012 10:05 AM, Muli Salem wrote:
Thanks for the comments, I updated the wiki page accordingly:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/ReloadableConfiguration
1. Instead of the new DB column is_reloadable
On 03/29/2012 09:14 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
see inline
Thanks,
Gilad.
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heimih...@redhat.com
To: Gilad Chaplikgchap...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:58:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] 'Import VM/Template More
On 04/01/2012 10:21 PM, Alex Lourie wrote:
On 04/01/2012 04:26 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 04/01/2012 12:09 PM, Alex Lourie wrote:
Hi All
I've written a new wiki page [1] for a feature we've developed,
called All in One. This allows configuring VDSM on the same host with
rhevm (ovirt
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Reloadable Configuration - Wiki Page
On 29/03/12 12:13, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/29/2012 11:59 AM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
On 29/03/12 10:54, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/29/2012 10:05 AM, Muli Salem wrote:
Thanks for the comments, I updated the wiki page accordingly:
http
On 04/05/2012 06:27 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
I was playing around with ovirt-engine datacenter definitions and I
seems that the capatibility version in the gui controls the qemu machine
type specified (3.0 - pc-0.14). I was wondering where that's
configured setup.
I grepped through my deployed
On 04/06/2012 12:43 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/05/2012 08:14 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 04/05/2012 06:27 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
I was playing around with ovirt-engine datacenter definitions and I
seems that the capatibility version in the gui controls the qemu machine
type specified (3.0 - pc
On 04/11/2012 11:50 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 10/04/12 14:35, Geert Jansen wrote:
On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
The Floating Disks feature makes disks into stand-alone
entities: a
given disk may be attached to a VM (as all disks are today), or it
may
On 04/18/2012 01:36 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
[Top Posting]
Let's try to concentrate on the subject of this thread (we can discuss shared
disks in a separate thread):
- I agree with Ori: Disks root collection should have all disks, not only floating
(shared?) disks. Disk is an important
On 04/18/2012 01:42 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
...
I suggest that for the upcoming release we'll do both, have 2 release
flavors, one RPM's like we released for 3.0 (with Jboss included) and
the other one tailored for Fedora.
My suggestion is that even if we decide to have two flavors of the
On 04/19/2012 01:44 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 04/19/2012 12:42 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
commit b9a6f23be188e2bf4d56f8b548db1b2536372385 - core: Add methods missing
from PGHack (detail / gitweb)
That is my fault. I introduced a change for Java 7 that fails in Java 6.
The solution is to
On 04/29/2012 04:19 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsbergdan...@redhat.com
To: Gal Hammergham...@redhat.com
Cc: vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 7:19:10 AM
signed-off-by has been enabled and is now required for all projects in
gerrit.
On 04/30/2012 02:44 PM, Moti Asayag wrote:
On 04/24/2012 06:11 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
per previous thread by Ryan Harper[1] and ovirt meeting today, starting
may 1st gerrit policy will change for all projects
On 05/03/2012 05:34 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 05/03/2012 05:24 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
Correlation-ID feature allows 'tagging' a call to a Backend command
with a String ID, and this ID will be appended to all log messages
that result from this command.
On 05/03/2012 06:15 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Correlation-ID feature allows 'tagging' a call to a Backend command
with a String ID, and this ID will be appended to all log messages
that result from this command.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/TaskManagerDetailed
In REST-API, we would like
On 05/03/2012 09:49 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
...
Hi Ori,
Is the intent here to allow correlation between multiple backend actions
initiated from a single restapi call, or an over-arching correlation
across multiple restapi calls?
If the former, then I'd agree with Yaniv, just generate the ID
On 05/06/2012 10:03 AM, Ori Liel wrote:
Still need to decide about this:
1) what's the name you'd give this parameter? job-id? batch-id?
flow-id? command-id? correlation-id???
job-id will confuse us with engine's job-id which is a single command today.
correleation-id is pretty long and
On 05/07/2012 07:06 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2012 02:06 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
i can't see any justification for the 'gluster' prefix,
as this is only additional /service/ provided by the project,
and Gluster now is a part of the RHT.
I believe
On 05/07/2012 11:52 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 05/07/2012 07:06 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2012 02:06 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
i can't see any justification for the 'gluster' prefix,
as this is only additional /service/
On 05/07/2012 08:13 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/07/2012 07:06 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2012 02:06 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
i can't see any justification for the 'gluster' prefix,
as this is only additional /service/ provided by the project
On 05/08/2012 12:00 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
1) what's the name you'd give this parameter? job-id? batch-id?
flow-id? command-id? correlation-id???
job-id will confuse us with engine's job-id which is a single
command
today.
correleation-id is pretty long and confusing as implies on
On 05/09/2012 11:40 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 05/08/2012 12:11 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/07/2012 08:13 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/07/2012 07:06 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2012 02:06 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
i can't see any justification
On 05/09/2012 11:58 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 05/09/2012 11:46 AM, Ori Liel wrote:
why not having type in volume?,
because the different volumes would be entirely different entities not
resembling each other
it's still works for our api, as non relevant properties does not shown in
On 05/11/2012 03:52 AM, Itzik Brown wrote:
Hi,
When running VDSM on host with Infiniband HCAs I get the following errors in
/usr/share/jboss-as/standalone/log/server.log on the ovirt-engine host.
WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager] (QuartzScheduler_Worker-17)
On 05/14/2012 07:05 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
* MetaTask-ID
-1, too pompous?
Me, pompous? Never! ;)
a maybe to remove the ID from name, since there is no uniqueness
guarantee.
Sure, MetaTask-Tag for example would be less connoting of uniqueness.
I like 'Tag'
only problem is we have
On 05/03/2012 03:18 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the input. Please see my inline comments.
Thanks
Gary
On 05/03/2012 12:02 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote:
Gary,
Thank you for a very detailed proposal.
I would like to address several issues of the proposed Quantum-oVirt
integration.
1.
On 05/15/2012 05:44 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heimih...@redhat.com
To: Eoghan Glynnegl...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 7:07:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
On 05/14/2012 07:05 PM,
On 05/16/2012 03:49 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 05/16/2012 03:26 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
Thanks,
Gilad.
- Original Message -
From: Ori Lielol...@redhat.com
To: Michael Pasternakmpast...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-develengine-devel@ovirt.org, Itamar Heimih...@redhat.com, Doron
On 05/16/2012 04:17 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 05/16/2012 04:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/16/2012 03:49 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 05/16/2012 03:26 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
Thanks,
Gilad.
- Original Message -
From: Ori Lielol...@redhat.com
To: Michael Pasternakmpast
On 05/16/2012 05:08 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 05/16/2012 04:38 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
please note vm exists is based on vm uuid, not on vm name
i think it based on name, Omer?
two different things:
1. vm name is unique.
2. import vm cannot import an existing vm based on it's uuid
On 05/17/2012 04:08 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
...
Hi,
Please review/comment on the Custom Properties Sheet feature page:
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/CustomPropertiesSheet
It looks great.
Are all the keys going to be exposed in the dropdown, or will we have
private keys that the user has
On 05/15/2012 02:55 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote:
...
ovirt engine keeps it. how would one query by it though? what api and
credentials would they be using to do so?
[IB] I think it should be accessible via REST and SDK .
I guess it should use admin credentials, but not sure.
REST doesn't
On 05/29/2012 08:56 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 28/05/12 21:31, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/28/2012 02:35 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it
explicitly, so I'll just go with that.
If someone feels strongly against, please reply.
I still like 'label
On 05/21/2012 09:37 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
Hi Pahim,
Thanks for the input!
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Gilad.
- Original Message -
From: Amador pahimapa...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:52:34 PM
Subject: [Engine-devel] LOCALFS path validation
On 05/23/2012 11:04 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 05/23/2012 12:59 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed last month[1], we had to deal with some issues which
turned out to be a Maven bug.
Thanks to Juan and Asaf's work, our current sources now build properly
using Maven 3.
So you're all
On 06/02/2012 12:00 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heimih...@redhat.com
To: Yaniv Kaulyk...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org, a...@ovirt.orga...@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 7:02:51 PM
Subject: compile time (was Re: [Engine-devel] Maven 3 here we
On 06/04/2012 09:41 AM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
On 03/06/12 23:04, Itamar Heim wrote:
fyi - gerrit has been upgraded to version 2.3.
___
Infra mailing list
in...@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
Adding the devel list.
Latest
On 06/04/2012 02:50 PM, Amador Pahim wrote:
On 06/03/2012 05:04 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/01/2012 08:16 PM, Amador Pahim wrote:
On 06/01/2012 12:39 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:37 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
Hi Pahim,
Thanks for the input!
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Gilad
please send a status of what works, what not, and gaps to close.
thanks
On 06/04/2012 05:24 PM, a...@redhat.com wrote:
Asaf Shakarchi has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: restapi: non admin user api - Filtering user queries (#783087)
Hi Daniel,
on the quantum-ovirt call today the question of live migration between
multiple technologies was raised.
iirc, you implemented the abstraction in libvirt between what the guest
sees and the actual host networking implementation for live migration.
can you please share if there
On 06/06/2012 07:07 PM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
Hey,
You should really send such question to engine-devel, as someone might have
encountered such an issue, so there might be a solution for that.
Can you also attach the vdsm.log file (in the host, under the directory
/var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log).
I
On 06/06/2012 11:41 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/06/2012 07:07 PM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
Hey,
You should really send such question to engine-devel, as someone might
have encountered such an issue, so there might be a solution for that.
Can you also attach the vdsm.log file (in the host, under
On 06/08/2012 01:23 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed Jun 6 12:07:55 EDT 2012 Oved Ourfalli wrote:
Hey,
You should really send such question to engine-devel, as someone might have
encountered such an issue, so there might be a solution for that.
Can you also attach the vdsm.log file (in the
On 06/08/2012 06:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:15:53PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
Hi Daniel,
on the quantum-ovirt call today the question of live migration
between multiple technologies was raised.
iirc, you implemented the abstraction in libvirt between what
On 06/10/2012 11:23 AM, Michael Kublin wrote:
Hi,
I found that we have a ovirt-engine/frontend/api/genericapi project, which is
for my opinion is not at use any more.
If there are any reason that we want to keep it , maybe someone using it and I
missed these?
Thanks Michael
On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
if so why it
appear in /disks?,
i think root collection /disks should contain only items available
for common usage.
(can't see any point in showing private vm disks there (such as
not-shareable not-floating))
i don't think it makes
On 06/12/2012 12:25 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
I'm wondering what's the usefulness of having dual action of attach +
activate to get a disk properly attached and working in a VM (and the
deactivate and detach counterparts).
The only reason I can think of is that we've annoyed the user by this
On 06/14/2012 04:59 PM, Mark Wu wrote:
Hi guys
I got the following error message when I tried to run a VM:
VM's swap percentage is above the threshold. (check your configuration
parameters for Host Swap Percentage).
After increasing the parameter BlockMigrationOnSwapUsagePercentage, the
On 06/19/2012 09:18 AM, Shu Ming wrote:
Hi,
I created a VM in my engine. And I found that every time I run the VM
after shutdown, the VM uuid was changed to a different not while the VM
itself was not changed including the VM name. Why doesn't engine keep
that is very strange. can you please
On 06/19/2012 05:40 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
Hi Dustin,
...
3. follow GWTP 0.7 migration steps
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/PortingV1#V0.7, which will
most likely involve UI code changes
can these be backward compatible with gwt 2.3?
For all steps mentioned above, I'm
On 06/23/2012 02:31 AM, Andy Grover wrote:
On 06/18/2012 01:15 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
Also, there is no mention on credentials in any part of the process.
How does VDSM or the host get access to actually modify the storage
array? Who holds the creds for that and how? How does the user set
I have moved all MODIFIED bugs to ON_QA with target release of 3.1[1]
This will allow to easily distinguish them from bugs fixed from now on,
and will allow reporters to try and verify the fix, should they choose to.
Plan is to close them currentrelease when 3.1 is released.
Thanks,
On 07/01/2012 11:50 AM, Ori Liel wrote:
We need to enable passing 'used' luns for new storage-domain creation (used =
the lun is part of a VG).
We need a way in rest-api to explicitly approve the use of such luns.
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good name for such a flag, a name that
On 07/03/2012 09:51 AM, Avi Tal wrote:
...
Why do we keep holding this Top level collection instead of having each network
related under his datacenter (/api/datacenter/id/networks)???
why do we keep VMs as top level? they only exist in data center...
why do we keep Clusters as top level?
On 07/03/2012 01:21 PM, Avi Tal wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Avi Tal a...@redhat.com
Cc: Mike Kolesnik mkole...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 10:00:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Fwd: Problem
On 07/03/2012 06:44 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
- Original Message -
Hey,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828089
I would like add a search option for searching disks of a VM or
Template,
Please suggest a name for the search option,
In the 'view' level we call it
On 07/16/2012 09:56 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 16/07/12 09:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 07/16/2012 01:46 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/15/2012 03:59 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/15/2012 01:53 AM, Ayal Baron wrote
On 07/16/2012 10:55 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 16/07/12 10:01, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 07/16/2012 09:56 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 16/07/12 09:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 07/16/2012 01:46 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/15/2012 03:59 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message
On 07/18/2012 12:46 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/18/2012 11:39 AM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 11:57 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/17/2012 08:19 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Juan Hernandez jhern...@redhat.com
To: Andrew Cathrow
On 07/22/2012 07:38 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com, Michael Kublin mkub...@redhat.com
Cc: Juan Hernandez jhern...@redhat.com, engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:50:47 AM
Subject: Re
On 07/23/2012 08:29 AM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Allon Mureinik amure...@redhat.com
Cc: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com, Juan Hernandez jhern...@redhat.com,
engine-devel@ovirt.org, Michael
Kublin mkub...@redhat.com
Sent: Sunday
On 07/20/2012 11:37 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
Last but not least, writing plugins in Google Web Toolkit (GWT) should
be as easy as providing your own plugin source page. Just deploy your
GWT plugin application on JBoss AS (next to engine.ear), and point to
GWT plugin application host page.
this
cooperation not in a separate container of their own choice,
different server, etc. - we can, but lets separate the discussion on the
two.
[1] - will be supported by UI plugin infrastructure
[2] - not supported by UI plugin infrastructure
Vojtech
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih
, UI plugins are static, as you wrote. UI plugins
written in GWT, however, can include server-side logic on their own.
Vojtech
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Vojtech Szocs vsz...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org, Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
