Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-22 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Enigmail user ;-) > Do I need to send my public key to the key servers again now? yes Olav - -- The Enigmail Project - OpenPGP Email Security For Mozilla Applications -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Dies ist eine elekt

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Enigmail User
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 3/21/2015 11:44, Onno Ekker wrote: > On 21-3-2015 16:39, Enigmail User wrote: >> On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: >>> Hi Patrick, >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> the point was: is it possible to further use a key that has/had MD5 and now > throws a warning by modifying it. If not, then the only way seems to be to > delete the key - if one doesn't want to /allow-weak-digest-algos/ . D'oh -- my bad. By "old key" I thought the poster meant, you know, an ol

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Robert, the point was: is it possible to further use a key that has/had MD5 and now throws a warning by modifying it. If not, then the only way seems to be to delete the key - if one doesn't want to /allow-weak-digest-algos/ . Olav - -- The Enigma

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> Is there any way in GPG to change the digest used with an older key? > I have a SHA-1 digest in a key that I use, and I'd like to make that > SHA-256 if possible. DSA-1024 requires a 160-bit hash, so if you're using that you're (somewhat) out of luck; even if you use SHA256, only 160 bits of it

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Onno Ekker
On 21-3-2015 16:39, Enigmail User wrote: > On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG > >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is > >> a good idea to get rid of the problem -- or this

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Enigmail User
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Patrick, > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is >> a good idea to get rid of the problem -- or this

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Bob Henson
On 21/03/2015 10:36 am, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Patrick, > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is a good >> idea to get rid of the problem -- or this just postponing the problem? > > Please don'

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Bob Henson
On 21/03/2015 9:57 am, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > > Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had private > keys, but all is now well. Thanks again, > > > So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now removed. > I'd like to restore them, but how to ged rid

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Patrick, > I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG > parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is a good > idea to get rid of the problem -- or this just postponing the problem? Please don't. MD5

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Patrick Brunschwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.03.15 10:57, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Bob, > >> Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had >> private keys, but all is now well. Thanks again, > > So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now > removed. I'd

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Bob, > Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had private > keys, but all is now well. Thanks again, So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now removed. I'd like to restore them, but how to ged rid of MD5 ther

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Bob Henson
On 20/03/2015 10:01 pm, Olav Seyfarth wrote: installed GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 >>> reason is, that GnuPG 2.0.27 errors out if it detects keys using MD5. >>> Workaround: use allow-weak-digest-algos in Enigmail or gpg.conf >> Is there a method to search for such keys? > > I definitely

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-20 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi David, > Googling this suggests it may be a conflict between gnome-agent and the > gpa-agent. I am running Ubuntu 14.10. sorry, but this IS off-topic (for this list) now ;-) But there is some hint on https://www.enigmail.net/support/gnupg2_is

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-20 Thread David
On 03/20/2015 06:01 PM, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > >>> installed GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 > >> reason is, that GnuPG 2.0.27 errors out if it detects keys using MD5. > >> Workaround: use allow-weak-digest-algos in Enigmail or gpg.conf > > Is there a method to search for such keys? > > I definit

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-20 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >>> installed GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 >> reason is, that GnuPG 2.0.27 errors out if it detects keys using MD5. >> Workaround: use allow-weak-digest-algos in Enigmail or gpg.conf > Is there a method to search for such keys? I definitely *don

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-20 Thread David
On 03/18/2015 12:04 PM, Bob Henson wrote: > On 18/03/2015 12:57 pm, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote: >> On 18.03.15 12:11, Bob Henson wrote: >>> I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. >>> I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - >>> getting the following

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-18 Thread Bob Henson
On 18/03/2015 12:57 pm, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote: > On 18.03.15 12:11, Bob Henson wrote: >> I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. >> I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - >> getting the following error message:- > >> error The spinner was indica

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-18 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 18.03.15 12:11, Bob Henson wrote: > I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. > I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - > getting the following error message:- > > error The spinner was indicating tha

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-18 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I confirm issues with Enigmail 1.8 in combination with GPG4win 2.2.4 (full). I see "gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey" twice and an error about key "" being more than once in trustdb along with a hint that MD5 sigs are rejected wh

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-18 Thread Kosuke Kaizuka
On 2015/03/18 20:11, Bob Henson wrote: > I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. I > couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - getting the > following error message:- > > error > The spinner was indicating that it was trying to load the keys, but > nothi

[Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-18 Thread Bob Henson
I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - getting the following error message:- error The spinner was indicating that it was trying to load the keys, but nothing happenedafter a considerable wait. I reinstalled