-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16.04.15 20:24, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
package/enigprefs-service.js mentions that it is dual-licensed
MPL-1.1 or GPL, but it doesn't indicate which version of the GPL.
Other dual-licensed parts of the codebase are explicitly GPL 2 or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17.04.15 12:24, Onno Ekker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Brunschwig
patr...@enigmail.net mailto:patr...@enigmail.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 16.04.15 20:24, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17.04.15 16:08, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote:
On 2015/04/17 22:06, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
Enigmail is not Mozilla, nor a product by Mozilla. It's (still)
MPL 1.1 licensed. To change the license would require to contact
_all_ contributors - going
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Brunschwig patr...@enigmail.net
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16.04.15 20:24, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
package/enigprefs-service.js mentions that it is dual-licensed
MPL-1.1 or GPL, but it doesn't indicate which
On 2015/04/17 22:06, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
Enigmail is not Mozilla, nor a product by Mozilla. It's (still) MPL
1.1 licensed. To change the license would require to contact _all_
contributors - going back 14 years - and ask for their permission.
Nothing I'd want to do...
On 2015/04/17 23:39, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
On 17.04.15 16:08, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote:
On 2015/04/17 22:06, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
Enigmail is not Mozilla, nor a product by Mozilla. It's (still)
MPL 1.1 licensed. To change the license would require to contact
_all_ contributors - going
package/enigprefs-service.js mentions that it is dual-licensed MPL-1.1
or GPL, but it doesn't indicate which version of the GPL. Other
dual-licensed parts of the codebase are explicitly GPL 2 or later (or
triple-licensed MPL-1.1|GPL-2.0+|LGPL-2.1+)
Adopting this patch (or something like it)
